Skip to content
Lung Cancer Research Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$801k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.6MScience & Tech$4.2MEducation$1.7MArts & Culture$373kYouth Development$150kRecreation & Sports$11k
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $239k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$29,890
Median grant
14
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$800,620
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE ITALIAN LEGIONS OF MERIT$320,000
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$231,130
UCLA$199,105
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$176,000
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$162,810
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$150,000
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$150,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$150,000
THE BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC$36,295
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$29,890
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$29,890
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$25,620
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$21,350
UNIVERSITY Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA$21,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $300k → 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $180k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $150k → 9%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITIES: $150k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $150k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $150k → 22%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150k → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $150k → 17%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $150k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO: $180k → 16%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $504k → 16%MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $150k → 15%THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $269k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $150k → 21%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $150k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $150k → 8%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $150k → 18%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NJ: $150k → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150k → 19%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $150k → 8%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $180k → 16%WEIL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $150k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $300k → 16%ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $231k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $150k → 8%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $269k → 14%UCLA: $199k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $163k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $150k → 8%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER: $150k → 9%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $150k → 14%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE ITALIAN LEGIONS OF MERIT: $320k → 17%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $150k → 9%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC: $801k → 16%CITY OF HOPE: $150k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $180k → 17%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $150k → 9%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUE: $300k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $176k → 17%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $176k → 17%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $150k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $250k → 16%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $300k → 17%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUE: $150k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $161k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.5M · 19 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
26

Total granted

$8.5M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

53%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $969k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +162%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +121%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $525k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2023 · $269k
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $269k · revenue +7%
  • TU
    THE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA
    one grant, 2021 · $180k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is American Society of the Italian Legions of Merit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
33/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTMD ANDERSON: $1,254,106 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,036,295 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $524,580 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $299,933 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $269,222 · Other+16 more: $1,302,040 · Other+16 moreYale University: $739,647 · EducationYale UniversityTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $600,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STA…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $462,810 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN …ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $449,937 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIVanderbilt University: $299,510 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $268,973 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $239,670 · EducationALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $231,130 · Education+16 more: $1,919,431 · Education+16 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,621,295 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,316,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANC…Vanderbilt University Medical Center: $450,000 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical…MAYO CLINIC: $150,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE: $150,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $150,000 · Health+7 more: $104,615 · HealthAmerican Society of the Italian Legions of Merit: $320,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwestern University: $10,675 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,586,176Education$5,211,108Health$3,941,910Arts & Culture$320,000Recreation & Sports$10,675

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,621,295 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $1,316,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $739,647 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $524,580 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $462,810 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $449,937 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $299,510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $268,973 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $239,670 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $231,130 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $169,215 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $149,948 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $149,923 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $42,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $29,890 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE HOSPITAL INC: $25,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - OREGON: $21,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic: $19,215 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $17,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $10,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHartford HealthCare Corporation: $10,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,675 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $6,405 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
American Cancer Society IncGA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lung Cancer Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lung Cancer Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home