Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lunda Charitable Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$21MPhilanthropy$4.8MEducation$703kRecreation & Sports$469kYouth Development$361kPublic Safety & Disaster$119kAnimals$101kFood & Nutrition$91kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$4,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$72M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUNDA COMMUNITY CENTER INC$1,000,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - LUNDA CENTER$55,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF BLACK RIVER FALLS$47,000
ALMA CENTER COMMUNITY FIRE DISTRICT$18,995
CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS$17,878
MELROSE-MINDORO SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,971
JACKSON COUNTY INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC$12,000
LINCOLN JRSR HIGH SCHOOL$11,000
KARNER BLUE GARDEN CLUB$5,130
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY$5,000
PROJECT CHRISTMAS$4,200
JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH$3,500
FRIENDS SHARING FOOD$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONROE COUNTY: $5k → 14%BLACK RIVER CHILD CARE CENTER: $6k → 13%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE: $5k → 13%BLACK RIVER CHILD CARE CENTER: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 36 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$28M
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+8%

Still filing today

28%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +153%
  • BR
    BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +54%
  • IC
    INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • BR
    BLACK RIVER FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $49k
  • MS
    MELROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
River Falls Community Food Pantry

Provide food to those in need in the River Falls Community

Food & Nutrition
2
Black River Good Neighbor Services Inc

As a community organization we provide confidential, temporary food, clothing, and financial assistance to help economically and nutritionally insecure individuals and families return to self-sufficiency.

—
3
Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc

Services to neighbors in need including the elderly

Human Services
4
Interfaith Caregivers - Faith in Action in Faribault County

To provide non-medical, volunteer-based support for older adults living in Faribault County in order to help them maintain independence, dignity and quality of life.

Human Services
5
Blanchard Valley Residential Services Inc

Blanchard valley residential services, inc. is dedicated to encouraging individuals with disabilities to reach their greatest potential while supporting quality, meaningful life choices and opportunities through person center approach in…

Human Services
6
Iowa River Hospice Inc

Provide hospice care and bereavement support services.

Human Services
7
Innovative Services Inc

Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.

Human Services
8
Black Rock Volunteer Fire Company

Fire protection

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Buffalo Senior Center Inc

The buffalo senior center, inc. provides human services, nutrition programs, transportation services, and other miscellaneous services to the senior residents of the city of buffalo and johnson county, wyoming.

—
10
Interchange Inc

Provide emergency food assistance to needy individuals in Milwaukee.

Food & Nutrition
11
Family Sharing of Ozaukee County Inc

To alleviate hunger and promote self-sufficiency with dignity and compassion to low-income, elderly and disabled residents of Ozaukee County.

Food & Nutrition
12
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black River Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lunda Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUNDA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,108,448 · Arts & CultureLUNDA COMMUNITY CENTER INCCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,800,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONJackson County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Inc: $827,000 · OtherJackson County Interfaith Volun…CITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLS: $483,590 · OtherCITY OF BLACK RIVER FALLSSCHOOL DISTRICT OF BLACK RIVER FALLS: $471,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF BLACK RIVER …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $306,399 · Other+55 more: $811,029 · Other+55 moreBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $20,300 · Human ServicesBLACK RIVER AREA CHILDCARE SERVICES INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHATFIELD FIRE & RESCUE INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · EducationINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS INC: $13,320 · ReligionFRIENDS SHARING FOOD INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$20,108,448Other$7,699,018Human Services$33,300Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Education$22,500Religion$13,320Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUNDA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,108,448 over 5y, 80% of budgetJackson County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Inc: $827,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetHATFIELD FIRE & RESCUE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $20,300 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS INC: $13,320 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS SHARING FOOD INC: $10,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAPTIV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK RIVER FALLS AREA FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBLACK RIVER AREA CHILDCARE SERVICES INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBLACK RIVER HEALTH INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE GREAT RIVERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBLACK RIVER FALLS FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $900 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUNDA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson County Interfaith Volunteer Caregivers Inc ↗
  • Who funds HATFIELD FIRE & RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SHARING FOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds APTIV INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK RIVER FALLS AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLACK RIVER AREA CHILDCARE SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Black River Falls Area FoundationWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Black River Falls Area Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lunda Charitable Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lunda Charitable Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lunda Charitable Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lunda Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lunda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph