Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Luke Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$243k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$456kArts & Culture$328kPublic Benefit$243kHealth$176kCivil Rights$158kReligion$135kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL$70,000
BLACKSTONE VALLEY TOURISM COUNCIL$33,100
INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
HONOLULU HARVEST CHINESE CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE CHURCH$20,000
RI ASSOC OF CHINESE AMERICANS$15,400
CITY OF CENTRAL FALLS$10,000
SAMARITANS RI$6,000
ELISHA PROJECT$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHINESE FOLKART WORKSHOP$5,000
SHEA HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
CUMBERLAND HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
WILLIAM M DAVIES TECH HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
JACQUELINE T WALSH HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 14%PROVIDENCE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 14%YMCA: $7k → 14%ELISHA PROJECT: $6k → 14%YMCA: $1k → 14%ELISHA PROJECT: $13k → 14%YMCA: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 31 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
31

Total granted

$1.4M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+72%

Still filing today

35%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BLACKSTONE VALLEY TOURISM COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $295k · revenue +70%
  • IL
    INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +36%
  • WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI
    4× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • PS
    PAWTUCKET SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2017 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca Rhode Island

The ywca rhode island provides cultural, educational and recreational programs specifically for women, girls and young children.

2
Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association Inc

Ri chiefs of police gather to share information on new or proposed state laws and maintaining best methods for state's citizens' protection

Community Improvement
3
The Alumni Association of the University of Rhode Island

The university of rhode island alumni association informs and engages current and future alumni as committed partners of the university, its missions and traditions.

4
The Rhode Island Public Health Foundation

The organization's mission is to eliminate health disparities in rhode island and beyond. the organization develops innovative public health programs, conducts translational and policy research, provides clinical services, and trains…

Health
5
Capital City Community Centers Inc

CCCC offers physical, social, recreational, educational, and health programs to citizens of Rhode Island. CCCC provides individuals and families with the tools they need to live independent, healthy, productive, and successful lives.

Human Services
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
Hospital Association of Rhode Island

To be a proactive advocate for the hospitals in rhode island that is capable of working for and with the hospitals to positively influence public opinion, legislative outcomes and regulatory policy. the purpose of such advocacy is to…

8
Rhode Island Kids Count Inc

Rhode island kids count, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation. the organization is a children's policy and advocacy organization that provides information on child well-being, stimulates dialogue on children's issues, and promotes…

Youth Development
9
Bryant University

Bryant University's mission is to educate and inspire students to discover their passion and become innovative leaders with character around the world.

Education
10
Parent Support Network of Rhode Island

The parent support network of ri is a group of parents, family members, transition age youth, and adults with behavioral health lived experience who are committed to supporting and assisting peers and working with statewide and national…

Human Services
11
Rhode Island Quality Institute

To represent every constituency of healthcare leadership, as well as health insurance, consumer and public interest. to work collaboratively, come up with innovative solutions, champion changes throughout our organizations, and dedicate…

Health
12
Rhode Island Interscholastic League

The mission of the rhode island interscholastic league is to provide educational opportunities for students through interscholastic athletics and supports member schools through governance, leadership, and athletic program administration.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rhode Island College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Elisha Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospital Support Organizati…Food Assistance & Basic Nee…Youth Education & Developme…Youth Sports LeaguesSupportive Housing for Vuln…Educational Scholarship Fun…Professional & Advocacy Ass…Brown University Medical Ed…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr18%44%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr14%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr18%28%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr14%24%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
10%
1,457/14,141

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS — $157,530 · OtherRHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANSCHINESE CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $85,226 · OtherCHINESE CHRISTIAN CHURCHCITY OF CENTRAL FALLS — $38,430 · OtherSHEA HIGH SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherWOMAN & INFANTS HOSPITAL — $30,000 · OtherWILLIAM M DAVIES TECH HIGH SCHOOL — $28,000 · OtherWILLIAM E TOLMAN HIGH SCHOOL — $28,000 · OtherCENTRAL FALLS HIGH SCHOOL — $28,000 · Other+39 more — $327,854 · Other+39 moreBLACKSTONE VALLEY TOURISM COUNCIL INC — $294,645 · Arts & CultureBLACKSTONE VALLEY TOU…+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $205,000 · Public BenefitINTERNATIONAL …WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI — $125,000 · HealthWOMEN & I…The Samaritans Inc — $6,000 · HealthRI COMMUNITIES FOR ADDICTION RECOVERY EFFORTS INC — $5,000 · Health+3 more — $4,500 · HealthBROWN UNIVERSITY — $95,000 · Community ImprovementPAWTUCKET FOUNDATION — $18,000 · Community ImprovementELISHA PROJECT — $19,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesGREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $8,823 · Human ServicesRHODE ISLAND RESCUE MINISTRIES — $3,000 · Human ServicesBLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER — $2,000 · Human ServicesBLACKSTONE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $28,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationPROJECT GOAL INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsCHINESE-AMERICAN SPORTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$783,040Arts & Culture$304,645Public Benefit$205,000Health$140,500Community Improvement$113,000Human Services$42,823Education$33,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLACKSTONE VALLEY TOURISM COUNCIL INC — $294,645 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $205,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetRHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS — $157,530 over 8y, 100% of budgetWOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI — $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $95,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKSTONE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $28,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetELISHA PROJECT — $19,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPAWTUCKET FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEXINGTON CHINESE SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $8,823 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Samaritans Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRI COMMUNITIES FOR ADDICTION RECOVERY EFFORTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Northern Rhode Island — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRHODE ISLAND RESCUE MINISTRIES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT GOAL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFamilies Reaching Into Each New Day Inc dba FRIENDS WAY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLORIA GEMMA BREAST CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL FALLS CHILDREN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACKSTONE VALLEY TOURISM COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS
  • Who funds WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BLACKSTONE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ELISHA PROJECT
  • Who funds PAWTUCKET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC
  • Who funds LEXINGTON CHINESE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds GREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds The Samaritans Inc
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RI COMMUNITIES FOR ADDICTION RECOVERY EFFORTS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Champlin FoundationPA28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Champlin Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Beacon Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Pawtucket Red Sox James J Skeffington Charitable Foundation · Navigant Credit Union

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Luke Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Luke Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Luke Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph