Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucky Corner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$43kHuman Services$41kRecreation & Sports$40kFood & Nutrition$38kEducation$22kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$6kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARION POLK FOOD SHARE$10,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$10,000
CAPITAL FUTBOL CLUB$10,000
TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$8,400
SMART READING OF SALEM$7,500
ST FRANCIS FAMILY HOUSING$3,000
SALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$3,000
CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY$3,000
ISAAC'S ROOM$3,000
FRIENDS OF FELINES$3,000
HELPING HANDS RESOURCES$2,500
HOPE STATION COMMUNIITY SERVICES INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 12%HELPING HANDS RESOURCES: $3k → 14%HOPE STATION COMMUNIITY SERVICES INC: $8k → 14%HOPE STATION COMMUNIITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%HOPE STATION COMMUNIITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $3k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $3k → 14%HOPE STATION COMMUNIITY SERVICES INC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$184k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+127%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $43k
  • CAPITAL FUTBOL CLUB
    5× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +172%
  • MF
    MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OREGON
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY - TAYLOR'S HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MW
    MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +127%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
2
Community Center of Hope

To provide facilities, resources, and education for the community from children to seniors in order to help improve quality of life.

Recreation & Sports
3
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
4
Hope Food Pantry

The organization intends to eliminate hunger and provide food and nutrition to people in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Pinnacle Resource Center

The mission of pinnacle resource center is to provide emergency shelter, food, clothing, and supportive services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness and poverty, with the goal of promoting stability and self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
6
Salaam Food Pantry

Support those in need (including senior citizens, disabled persons) with food,groceries and hot lunch in our community and give everyone an opportunity to be part of the cause.

Human Services
7
Hope Ministries of Northern Kentucky Inc

Hope ministries helps low income families in northern kentucky with emergency food assistance, clothing, household items, and used toys.

Human Services
8
Adams Wells Crisis Center

To provide shelter and assistance for abused families. the help we offer addresses the fundamental needs of life; temporary refuge in our shelter, food, clothing and emergency medical needs. it is our goal to create hope in the hearts of…

Human Services
9
Coalition Against Poverty in Suffolk Inc

The coalition against poverty in suffolk (caps) states that it's mission is for churches and organizations working together for poverty alleviation and community development in the city of suffolk, virginia. caps accomplishes this in two…

Human Services
10
Human Services Programs of Carroll County Inc

Hsp gives hope, inspires change, and provides opportunity by mobilizing the community in the fight against poverty.

Housing & Shelter
11
City of Refuge Hopewell Inc

City of refuge is a faith-based drug recovery center that desires to bring hope and opportunity to individuals and families of hopewell and the tri-cities area by offering supportive services, recovery, job placement assistance and…

Health
12
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency; the most unlike its peers is Isaac's Room. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $42,500 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONCAPITAL FUTBOL CLUB: $40,000 · OtherCAPITAL FUTBOL CLUBSMART READING OF SALEM: $12,500 · OtherSMART READING OF SALEMFRIENDS OF FELINES: $9,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF FELINESSALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherSALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIONST FRANCIS FAMILY HOUSING: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $7,000 · Other+3 moreMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $37,500 · Food & NutritionMARION-POLK FOOD SHA…HOPE STATION COMMUNITY SERVICES IN: $20,000 · Human ServicesHOPE STATION COMMUNI…TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $8,400 · Human ServicesTILLAMOOK COUNTY FAM…CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $6,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HOPE AND …HELPING HANDS RESOURCES: $2,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS RESOUR…ISAAC'S ROOM: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$127,000Food & Nutrition$37,500Human Services$36,900Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPITAL FUTBOL CLUB: $40,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE STATION COMMUNITY SERVICES IN: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAPITAL FUTBOL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MARION-POLK FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE STATION COMMUNITY SERVICES IN ↗
  • Who funds SALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY ↗
  • Who funds ISAAC'S ROOM ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Salem Foundation · Maps Community Foundation · Pioneer Trust Bank Na Foundation · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Salem Health · Ralph Hull Foundation · Willamette Health Council · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucky Corner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucky Corner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency: 81% of income from government
  • Center for Hope and Safety: 68% of income from government
  • Isaac's Room: 5% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Capital Futbol Club: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lucky Corner’s filings →

More from the funding graph