Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ls Wood Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$315k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$2.0MRecreation & Sports$31kScience & Tech$8kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $147k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$44,500
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-BOULDER$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILL URBANA CHAMPAIGN$20,000
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY$20,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$13,000
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$10,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$10,000
METROPOLITAN STATE UNI OF DENVER$10,000
COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE$8,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$5,000
REGIS UNIVERSITY$5,000
CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$5,000
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$5,000
MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 53 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
24

Total granted

$1.6M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+23%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    REGIS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +30%
  • DU
    DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $28k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILL URBANA CHAMP
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CO SPRING
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MU
    Marquette University
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
11
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyola University of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 67 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr13%63%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr21%21%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr13%45%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,380

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDER — $301,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDERCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY — $271,500 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY — $155,500 · OtherCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITYBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $69,500 · Other+61 more — $638,000 · Other+61 moreREGIS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITYLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $35,000 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY O…DEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $28,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITYRhodes College — $20,000 · EducationRhodes CollegeCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN…University of Dayton — $16,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $16,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $15,000 · EducationCAPITAL UNIVERSITY — $12,500 · Education+12 more — $95,000 · Education+12 moreNorthwestern University — $16,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,436,000Education$307,500Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY — $28,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARRY UNIVERSITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLewis University — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Rhodes College
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds University of Dayton
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ELMHURST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ls Wood Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Ls Wood Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $329k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph