Skip to content
Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$818kEducation$402kHousing & Shelter$55kYouth Development$48kHealth$35kFood & Nutrition$5kReligion$4kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Newark$81,000
Westfield Area YMCA$8,000
Mother Seton High School$7,500
Roselle Catholic High School$7,500
Holy Trinity School$7,500
St Bartholomew Academy$7,500
Mount Saint Mary Academy$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Family Promise$5,000
Covenant House$4,000
Concordia Learning Center St Jospehs School for the Blind$4,000
St Helen's Outreach Program$4,000
Children Fun in the Sun Foundation$4,000
St Jospehs Social Service Center$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Center for Hope & Safety: $2k → 7%FURNATURE ASSIST INC: $1k → 10%FURNATURE ASSIST INC: $1k → 10%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Newark: $81k → 16%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Newark: $75k → 16%Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Newark: $60k → 16%ROSEPETALS INC: $5k → 16%ROSEPETALS INC: $1k → 16%Rosepetals: $300 → 16%THE WAREHOUSE NJ: $5k → 16%Bridges Outreach: $8k → 10%Bridges Outreach: $3k → 10%The Connection for Women & Families: $2k → 10%The Connection for Women & Families: $1k → 10%ONE WORLD ONE LOVE: $1k → 10%COMMUNITY ACCESS UNLIMITED: $3k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $14k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $12k → 10%St Jospehs Social Service Center: $9k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $7k → 10%St Jospehs Social Service Center: $7k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 10%ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HO: $5k → 10%ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HO: $5k → 10%ST JOSPEHS SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $4k → 10%St Jospehs Social Service Center: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 36 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $216k · revenue +36%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +761%
  • FAMILY PROMISE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +483%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN VIANNEY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • EC
    ELIZABETH COALITION HOUSE HOMLESS
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • WN
    WAREHOUSE NJ
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc

Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…

Crime & Legal
2
Family Promise of Sussex County Inc

To secure housing stability and sustainability for those in crisis, because everyone deserves a home.

Human Services
3
Nj 2-1-1 Partnership a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation

The organization's mission is to make the critical connection between individuals and families seeking health and/or human services and the organizations best able to meet their needs.

Human Services
4
Making It Possible to End Homelessness Inc

The organization's mission is to increase local services and resources for the homeless. miph provides affordable permanent housing in central new jersey, giving families a stable place to live while they prepare for their lives free from…

Housing & Shelter
5
Carelink Community Support Services Nj

Carelink community support services of new jersey's mission is to assist adult citizens of nj living with psychiatric disability in acquiring the tools necessary to live health and fulfilling lives.

Health
6
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Human Services
7
Isaiah House Inc

The primary mission of isaiah house, inc. (organization") is to reduce the prevalence of homelessness throughout essex county and specifically within the oranges and surrounding areas. through a variety of programs, the organization works…

—
8
New Hope Integrated Behavioral Health Care Inc

New hope integrated behavioral health care, inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, provides commission on the accreditation of rehabilitation facilities (carf) and nj licensed substance use and co-occurring mental health disorder…

—
9
Triple C Housing Inc

To provide permanent supportive housing opportunities coupled with innovative support services empowering indivduals to live independently with dignity and to fullfull their utmost potential.

—
10
Bridges Nj Inc

When a family is in crisis, Bridges is there to offer support by providing respite and host homes for children in our community. Children visit respite homes for several hours after school or on weekends to enjoy the benefit of a nurturing…

Human Services
11
Human Needs Food Pantry Inc

To provide food, clothing, household goods and other services to people in need who live in montclair, nj and other neighboring communities in essex county

Human Services
12
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph Social Service Center; the most unlike its peers is The Old First Historic Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE: $454,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THEMOUNT SAINT MARY ACADEMY: $62,500 · OtherMOUNT SAINT MARY ACADEMYMOTHER SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $62,500 · OtherMOTHER SETON HIGH SCHOOLHoly Trinity School: $49,000 · OtherROSELLE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherWestfield Area YMCA: $35,500 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE: $34,000 · Other+30 more: $276,500 · Other+30 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $216,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE …ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $67,500 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE C…+9 more: $41,300 · Human Services+9 moreFAMILY PROMISE INC: $23,500 · Housing & ShelterUNION COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · EducationRESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthTRINITAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE OLD FIRST HISTORIC TRUST INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,012,000Human Services$324,800Housing & Shelter$23,500Education$11,500Health$6,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK: $216,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $67,500 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $23,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNION COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRosepetals Incorporated: $6,300 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetRESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWAREHOUSE NJ: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS UNLIMITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONNECTION FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOINONIA ACADEMY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OLD FIRST HISTORIC TRUST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetST PETER'S FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFURNITURE ASSIST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne World One Love A NJ Non-Profit: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNION COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rosepetals Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WAREHOUSE NJ ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Investors Foundation …Community Foundation …Ej Grassmann TrustThe Summit FoundationThe Hyde and Watson F…Bristol-Myers Squibb …The Provident Bank Fo…Columbia Bank Foundat…Pseg Foundation IncCitizens Philanthropi…Ucsb Charitable Found…Union Foundation
Investors Foundation IncNJ27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Summit Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Ucsb Charitable Foundation Inc · Union Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Center for Hope and Safety Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Bridges Outreach Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Community Access Unlimited Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Louis J & Fannie Roncoli Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis J & Fannie Roncoli’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home