Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lou and Connie Miller Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.3MArts & Culture$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.2MHuman Services$430kHealth$182kEnvironment$80kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The University of Oklahoma Foundation$700,000
Oklahoma State University Foundation$300,000
Tulsa Ballet Theatre$75,000
Street School$50,000
First Americans Museum$30,000
Tulsa River Parks Authority$25,000
University of Oklahoma College of Law$25,000
Tulsa Girls Art School$15,000
Clarehouse$10,000
Operation Hope Ministry$10,000
Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma$10,000
Neighbors On the Line$10,000
Tulsa Boys Home$10,000
St Simeon's Episcopal Church Foundation$10,000
Seminole High School Scholarship Endowment$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%First Americans Museum: $35k → 16%First Americans Museum: $35k → 16%First Americans Museum: $30k → 16%Neighbors Along the Line: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $3k → 14%Hearts for Hearing: $5k → 15%Hearts for Hearing: $5k → 15%Emergency Infant Services: $103k → 15%Clarehouse: $10k → 15%Clarehouse: $10k → 15%Clarehouse: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $1k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%Assistance League of Tulsa: $10k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 31 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
23

Total granted

$6.6M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+3%

Still filing today

61%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +90%
  • TB
    TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +73%
  • STREET SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • OC
    OU COLLEGE OF LAW
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • HR
    Hominy Ranchers Rural Fire Dept Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • Living Arts of Tulsa Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
4
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
5
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal
8
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
9
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
10
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
11
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
12
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Green Country Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hispanic American Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundation: $1,440,000 · EducationOklahoma State University FoundationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,315,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INCSTREET SCHOOL INC: $187,600 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC+1 more: $100 · EducationUniversity of Oklahoma College of Law: $1,125,000 · OtherUniversity of Oklahoma College of…OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $340,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…St Simeon's Episcopal Church Foundation: $103,000 · OtherTulsa Botanic Garden: $80,000 · OtherOperation Hope Ministry: $70,000 · Other+30 more: $293,030 · Other+30 moreTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $1,083,500 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEATR…Hispanic American Foundation Inc: $71,550 · Arts & CultureHispanic American F…+3 more: $21,000 · Arts & CultureEmergency Infant Services Inc: $126,100 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $91,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc: $41,330 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $140,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $25,250 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$2,942,700Other$2,011,030Arts & Culture$1,176,050Human Services$401,430Health$141,000Crime & Legal$25,250Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $1,440,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $1,315,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $1,083,500 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $187,600 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES: $140,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $126,100 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $91,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHispanic American Foundation Inc: $71,550 over 6y, 22% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $41,330 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $15,250 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTULSA OPERA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLiving Arts of Tulsa Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION AWARE OF OKLAHOMA: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $8,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $5,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTulsa County Bar Association Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR BUNKER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior League of Tulsa Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Hispanic American Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Arts of Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION AWARE OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK52.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Oneok Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lou and Connie Miller Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lou and Connie Miller Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lou and Connie Miller Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lou and Connie Miller Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lou and Connie Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph