Skip to content

· Public charity

Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundation

Organization's primary exempt purpose is to secure donations for other charitable organizations in furtherance of rotary's motto of service above self.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$202kHealth$103kEducation$96kHuman Services$74kFood & Nutrition$30kPhilanthropy$20k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $104,722, the rows itemized in this filing. The $213,762 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,040 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
$34,647
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$48,311
SEEING AGAIN GUATEMALA$34,647
BILL WILSON CENTER$16,764
LOS GATOS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BILL WILSON CENTER: $17k → 8%GRANDE CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: $25k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 38% of Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 65%.

Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 5 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$168k
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
0%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LOS GATOS ROTARY CHARITIES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $97k · revenue -23%
  • BW
    BILL WILSON CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2018–2020 · $16k

Funded once

  • LG
    LOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $52k
  • LG
    LOS GATOS HS INTERACT CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $32k
  • GC
    Grande Center for Education and Economic Opportunity
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Altos Sunset Rotary Club Endowment Fund Inc
Community Improvement
2
South San Francisco Rotary Foundation
—
3
Rotary Club of Santa Rosa Foundation

Award grants to deserving non-profit organizations, and scholarships to worthy students in the greater santa rosa area.

—
4
Palo Alto Rotary Club Annual Charities Inc

Raise money for, and to distribute money to carefully qualified recipients.

Education
5
Sanger Rotary Foundation

Support charitable need within the greater Sanger community.

Philanthropy
6
Los Gatos Museum Association

Engaging community at the intersection of art, history and education through innovative, locally connected and globally relevant exhibits, programs and experiences.

—
7
Rotary Club of Gilroy

Service to the community and the world

—
8
The Los Altos Rotary Endowment Fund Inc

Community & international service projects

—
9
Laguna Beach Rotary Club Foundation

The Laguna Beach Rotary Club Foundation provides grants to educational, civic and social service organizations.

Health
10
Los Altos Journalism Foundation C/O Dennis a Young
—
11
Rotary Club of San Rafael Fund

Scholarships, educator awards, financial support of community organizations

—
12
Rotary Club of Ojai Educational Foundation Inc

To provide scholarships for worthy students and to provide educational grants for charitable organizations with financial needs.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Shelterbox Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS GATOS ROTARY CHARITIES FOUNDATION: $96,835 · OtherLOS GATOS ROTARY CHARITIES FOUNDATIONLOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDATION: $52,294 · OtherLOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDATIONLOS GATOS HS INTERACT CLUB: $31,665 · OtherLOS GATOS HS INTERACT CLUBROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $15,740 · OtherROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherLOS GATOS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $28,317 · Other+5 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $158,589 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY IN…BILL WILSON CENTER: $31,404 · Human ServicesBILL WILSON CENT…Grande Center for Education and Economic Opportunity: $25,000 · Human ServicesGrande Center fo…SHELTERBOX USA INC: $17,827 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA I…LOS GATOS MORNING ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,182 · PhilanthropyLOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,617 · Education
Other$264,351International$158,589Human Services$74,231Philanthropy$20,182Education$7,617

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $158,589 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS GATOS ROTARY CHARITIES FOUNDATION: $96,835 over 2y, 17% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER: $31,404 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrande Center for Education and Economic Opportunity: $25,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetLOS GATOS MORNING ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,182 over 1y, 12% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $17,827 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,617 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds LOS GATOS ROTARY CHARITIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BILL WILSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Grande Center for Education and Economic Opportunity ↗
  • Who funds LOS GATOS MORNING ROTARY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS GATOS ROTARY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Los Gatos Rotary Charities Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Los Gatos Rotary Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph