Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lokken O'Dea II Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$45kEducation$40kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$30kInternational$16kHuman Services$10kScience & Tech$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$415k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE COLLEGE$15,000
CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$5,000
HARBOR HUMANCE SOCIETY MI$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $10k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $10k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
MO
KY
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Lokken O'Dea II Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lokken O'Dea II Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 4 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +361% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
11

Total granted

$101k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+361%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2018–2022 · $35k · revenue +9%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +361%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $20k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • AH
    ADVENT HEALTH'S TRANSPLANT INSTITUTE (FORMERLY FLORIDA HOSPITAL)
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • VC
    VITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • PH
    Project Help Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
2
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
3
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
4
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
5
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
6
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
7
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
10
The Halo Trust (Usa) Inc

To protect lives and restore livelihoods of people affected by conflict: 1) to protect lives from the explosive threats and hazards resulting from conflict, 2) to reduce human suffering from armed violence and 3) to build resilient and…

International
11
Population Connection

Overpopulation threatens the quality of life for people everywhere. population connection is the national grassroots population organization that educates young people and advocates progressive action to stabilize world population at a…

Social Science
12
Corus Solutions Inc

Corus solutions is a center where innovative public health and allied programs can be conceived, tested and implemented on behalf of ima world health. ima innovations will pursue creative projects that expand and refine the agency's public…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International; the most unlike its peers is Charity Navigator. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constitu…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesADVENT HEALTH'S TRANSPLANT INSTITUTE (FORMERLY FLORIDA HOSPITAL): $10,000 · OtherADVENT HEALTH'S TRANSPLAN…SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…RED CROSS SOUNTHEAST MICHIGAN HEADQUATER: $5,000 · OtherRED CROSS SOUNTHEAST MICH…PEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $5,000 · OtherPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VI…TEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TORNADO RELIEF FUND: $5,000 · OtherTEAM WESTERN KENTUCKY TOR…HARBOR HUMANCE SOCIETY MI: $5,000 · OtherHARBOR HUMANCE SOCIETY MIPOLARIS: $2,500 · OtherPOLARISSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL…HOPE COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEVITAS COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $10,000 · HealthVITAS COMMUN…Project Help Inc: $10,000 · HealthProject Help…Children International: $11,000 · InternationalChildren …POLARIS PROJECT: $5,000 · InternationalPOLARIS P…HARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 · Animals
Human Services$70,500Other$42,500Education$35,000Health$20,000International$16,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Help Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARBOR HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Navigator: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lokken O'Dea II Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lokken O'Dea II Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Project Help Inc: 45% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lokken O'Dea II Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph