Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$244kFood & Nutrition$227kReligion$175kPhilanthropy$47kHealth$37kEducation$25kYouth Development$20kCivil Rights$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $244k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $10k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $75k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $60k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $25k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $20k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $10k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $5k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $5k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$783k · 20 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$783k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $204k · revenue +8%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $67k · revenue +17%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • MC
    MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +18%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • AL
    ANTI-DFEMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
2
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
7
Ywca Metropolitan Chicago

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
8
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
9
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
10
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc

Gleaners' mission is to be a leader in the fight against hunger. we do this by joining with others to optimize equitable access to nutritious food for those of us facing hunger and working to overcome the conditions causing food insecurity.

—
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Acoustic Neuroma Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARK: $172,200 · OtherTHE ARKJEWISH WOMENS FOUNDATION: $21,600 · OtherJEWISH WOMENS FOUNDATIONWINGS: $20,000 · OtherWINGSKESHET: $15,000 · OtherKESHETTHE THRESHOLDS: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $31,540 · Other+8 moreCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $203,600 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLYSHALVA INC: $30,400 · Human ServicesSHALVA INCCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $67,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORYNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANKSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $48,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDTHREE SQUARE: $47,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUAREMINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $25,000 · EducationJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,000 · InternationalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$270,340Human Services$244,000Food & Nutrition$227,000Education$25,000Philanthropy$25,000International$18,000Crime & Legal$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $203,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $67,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $30,400 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA SILVER LINING FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAcoustic Neuroma Association: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds A SILVER LINING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Acoustic Neuroma Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd?

Find your warmest path to Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lois Simon Charitable Foundation Ltd’s filings →

More from the funding graph