Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lois Eleanor Neff Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$183kFood & Nutrition$131kHealth$62kArts & Culture$51kReligion$40kEducation$38kAnimals$21kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLARENCE CARE CENTER$6,000
HELPING HANDS OF CLARENCE$6,000
SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$6,000
SALT RIVER COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$6,000
SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC$6,000
HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HANNIBAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$4,000
RAY OF HOPE$4,000
SHELBINA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS$4,000
SHELBY COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL$4,000
SHELBINA ARTS COUNCIL$3,500
NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS$3,000
ADAIR COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $5k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $5k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $4k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $4k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $4k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $4k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $3k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $3k → 19%BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS: $2k → 19%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC: $4k → 15%SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$595k · 19 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$595k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+58%

Still filing today

47%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionArts & CulturePublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +30%
  • NH
    NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +27%
  • BB
    Birthday Blessings
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • HA
    HANNIBAL AREA NUTRITION CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • HA
    HANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Shelby County

To care for homeless, abused, neglected and abandoned animals and educate the community to instill an increased awareness and commitment to the responsibility of animal ownership and protection.

Animals
2
Shelby County Humane Society Inc

To provide care and adoption of unwanted domestic animals and low or no cost spay and neuter services for shelby county animal owners.

Animals
3
The Humane Society of Southeast Mo

To advocate for humane treatment of all animals and encourage spaying and neutering to decrease overpopulation of domestic animals.

Animals
4
Heartland Humane Society of Missouri

Heartland Humane Society of Missouri is a 501 c3 non profit group of dedicated foster homes that gives abandoned abused and unwanted animals another chance for loving permanent homes through our adoption program following the no-kill…

Animals
5
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
6
Humane Society of Jefferson County

Animal well being and shelter operation

Animals
7
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
8
Humane Society of Whitley County I

The humane society provides food, shelter, and medical attention to stray or lost animals. the shelter tries to find homes for these animals

Animals
9
Steuben County Humane Society Inc

Welfare and care of animals

Animals
10
Hubbard County Food Shelf

Receive and dispense food to needy clients

—
11
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—
12
Humane Society of North Central Iow

Provide for shelter, food, veterinary services and adoption of small animals. this shelter operates as a no kill shelter in north central iowa.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelby County Food Pantry; the most unlike its peers is Hannibal Alliance for Youth Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALT RIVER COMMUNITY CARE CENTER: $51,790 · OtherSALT RIVER COMMUNITY CARE CENTERCLARENCE CARE CENTER: $51,000 · OtherCLARENCE CARE CENTERHELPING HANDS OF CLARENCE: $46,500 · OtherHELPING HANDS OF CLARENCEHANNIBAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $43,000 · OtherHANNIBAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONSHELBY COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $38,000 · OtherSHELBY COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INCSHELBINA ARTS COUNCIL: $32,000 · OtherSHELBINA ARTS COUNCILRAY OF HOPE: $25,500 · OtherRAY OF HOPE+6 more: $40,002 · Other+6 moreSHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC INC: $51,000 · Human ServicesSHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CI…SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $42,000 · Human ServicesSHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANT…Birthday Blessings: $33,500 · Human ServicesBirthday BlessingsNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $34,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,000 · AnimalsADAIR COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 · AnimalsSHELBY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN: $19,000 · Arts & CultureHANNIBAL FREE CLINIC: $18,500 · HealthHANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$387,792Human Services$126,500Food & Nutrition$34,000Animals$20,500Arts & Culture$19,000Health$18,500Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC INC: $51,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetSHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $42,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $34,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBirthday Blessings: $33,500 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetSHELBINA ARTS COUNCIL: $32,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetHANNIBAL FREE CLINIC: $18,500 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetNORTHEAST MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY: $11,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetADAIR COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $9,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHELBY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELBY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds Birthday Blessings ↗
  • Who funds SHELBINA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SHELBY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN ↗
  • Who funds HANNIBAL FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST MISSOURI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ADAIR COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HANNIBAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George H Riedel FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George H Riedel Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lois Eleanor Neff Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lois Eleanor Neff Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lois Eleanor Neff Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lois Eleanor Neff Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lois Eleanor Neff’s filings →

    More from the funding graph