· Private foundation
Logan Healthcare Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $236k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC | $60,000 |
| FACING HUNGER FOOD BANK | $60,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT | $50,000 |
| CHIEF LOGAN REC CENTER INC | $47,599 |
| HUNGRY LAMB FOOD INITIATIVE INC | $45,494 |
| WILLIAMSON HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER | $35,000 |
| RURAL HEALTH ACCESS CORPORATION | $35,000 |
| BARN COMMUNITY CENTER | $30,000 |
| LOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $29,714 |
| CHURCH OF GOD WEST LOGAN | $13,329 |
| LOGAN COUNTY HEALTH DEPTLOGAN COUNTY QRT | $6,000 |
| ONE VOICE | $6,000 |
| HERO HOUSE | $6,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 72% of Logan Healthcare Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in WV; read by stated purpose it is 22% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $271k · revenue +53%
- RHRURAL HEALTH ACCESS CORPORATION DBA COALFIELD HEALTH CENTER4× · 2019–2025 · $173k · revenue +230%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC7× · 2018–2025 · $153k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- PCPRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +4%
- CFCENTER FOR RURAL HEALTHone grant, 2017 · $50k
- CCCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INCone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.
Provision of primary and preventive care services to the rural population of wirt, jackson, and wood counties in west virginia and the surrounding areas.
To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.
The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…
Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.
To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.
The mission of roane family health care is to exceed the quality of care that our patients deserve and expect while surpassing community needs through innovative technology.
To provide primary care services at no cost to uninsured and underinsured low income residents of west virginia.
Work to improve the health of children and families in west virginia through leadership. to provide a forum for diverse organizations to discuss, coordinate and collaborate on issues that improve the health and well-being of west virginia…
Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.
To collectively strengthen integrated behavioral and primary healthcare system by providing a continuum of services to the community that is responsive, accessible, and high-quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hero House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds LOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RURAL HEALTH ACCESS CORPORATION DBA COALFIELD HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Boone Memorial Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY GROUP OF SWV INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAMSON HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA RURAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TUG RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Hungry Lamb Food Initiative ↗
- Who funds PRIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds KANAWHA VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYCHILD NOW ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA LOCAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds ABLE FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds West Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Highmark Foundation · West Virginia University Research Corporation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · United Way of Central West Virginia · Encova Foundation of West Virginia
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Logan Healthcare Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Logan Healthcare Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Logan Healthcare Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.