Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Missouri · Private foundation

Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2017
12
Grants FY2017
12
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$100
Largest grant, FY2017
$10,000
States reached, FY2017
4
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Harriman-Jewell Series$10,0001n/a
Friends of Yad Sarah Inc$10010%
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$10010%
Harvesters - the Community Food Network$1001n/a
Rose Brooks Center Inc$10010%
Jewish Family Services$10010%

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Compare Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb with peer funders

About Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb

How much does Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb give?
Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb reported 12 grants totaling $16,100 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (62%), Philanthropy (31%), Human Services (3%).
Who are Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Harriman-Jewell Series ($10k), Friends of Yad Sarah Inc ($100), Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc ($100).
Does Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb based?
Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loeb Charitable Foundation co Esther Loeb’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home