Skip to content

Louisiana · Private foundation

Live Oak Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$925k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
4
Organizations funded FY2020
100%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$77,059
Largest grant, FY2020
$308,238
Organizations funded a year
1 to 15
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 100% of the organizations Live Oak Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $925k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20204$925k100%
FY20191$3k0%
FY201812$21k25%
FY201715$47kn/a
86% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$926kReligion$34kHealth$16kAnimals$5kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$3kEnvironment$3kYouth Development$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
NY
WY
PA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
LA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
St Mary Magdalen Catholic Church$20,0002n/a
Ochsner Clinic Foundation$11,00010%
Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc$2,50020%
232-Help Inc$2,50010%
Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation$2,00020%
Ducks Unlimited Inc$2,00020%
Hospice of Acadiana Foundation Inc$2,00020%
National Audubon Society Inc$1,00010%
Child Crisis Arizona$1,00010%

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($952k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Live Oak Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOchsner Clinic Foundation: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget232-Help Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHazelden Betty Ford Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Acadiana Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNational Audubon Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild Crisis Arizona: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Zuschlag Family FoundationLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zuschlag Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Live Oak Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Live Oak Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Live Oak Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Live Oak Foundation

How much does Live Oak Foundation give?
Live Oak Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $924,712 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Live Oak Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (93%), Religion (3%), Health (2%).
Who are Live Oak Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: St Mary Magdalen Catholic Church ($20k), Ochsner Clinic Foundation ($11k), Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ($3k).
Does Live Oak Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Live Oak Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Live Oak Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Zuschlag Family Foundation.
Where is Live Oak Foundation based?
Live Oak Foundation is based in LA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Live Oak’s filings →

More from the funding graph