Skip to content

· Private foundation

Littick Arline Clay Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$517kEducation$266kReligion$185kCommunity Improvement$99kHuman Services$73kYouth Development$51kPublic Benefit$27kAnimals$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$2,938
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI$51,219
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$14,626
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$14,626
ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC$14,626
OHIO UNIVERSITY$7,340
Individual grant recipient$7,340
UNTD WAY OF MUSKINGUM$2,938
MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL 467$2,938
OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$2,938
MUSKINGUM COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER SOCIETY$2,938
THE CARR CENTER INC$1,463
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,463
SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP$1,463
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$1,463
ZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER$1,463
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 2% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15k → 22%ZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $19k → 10%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%ZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $19k → 10%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%ZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $18k → 10%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $18k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $17k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $16k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $68k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $66k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $63k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $56k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $52k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $51k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $48k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $42k → 14%GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $39k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $26k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $17k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $16k → 14%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $16k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $16k → 14%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $16k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $15k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $14k → 14%BETH ABRAHAM CONGREGATION: $14k → 14%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $14k → 14%ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $13k → 14%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $13k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%ZANESVILLE ART CTR: $10k → 14%ZANESVILLE ART CTR: $9k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%ZANESVILLE ART CTR: $9k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND: $9k → 14%ZANESVILLE ART CTR: $8k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND: $8k → 14%ZANESVILLE ART CTR: $8k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
VA
MD
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 25 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$27k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +27%
  • OW
    OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +53%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $17k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • BA
    BETH ABRAHAM CONGREGATION
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • OH
    OHIO HEARTLAND'S COUNCIL GIRL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskingum Recreation Center

Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.

Recreation & Sports
2
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
3
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Ohio Association of Community Colleges

Oacc is dedicated to the advancement and implementation of sound policy and initiatives that work to ensure the success of the more than 300,000 community college students in ohio. rooted in the belief that every person should have access…

Education
6
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
7
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel college of nursing is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

—
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
American Board of Medical Specialties

In collaboration with its member boards, abms creates standards for board certification for physicians and medical specialists. specifically, for initial and continuing certification. abms and its member boards establish rigorous standards…

—
10
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
11
American Chemical Society

The american chemical society is a federally chartered organization whose mission is to advance the broader chemistry enterprise and its practitioners for the benefit of earth and its people.

Science & Tech
12
Association of American Universities Inc

Founded in 1900, aau is composed of 71 distinguished institutions in the united states and canada that continually advance society through education, research, and discovery. our u.s. member universities earn the majority of competitively…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Ohio's Heartland Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATI: $485,421 · OtherGENESIS BETHESDA HEALTH FOUNDATIST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $132,613 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCHOHIO UNIVERSITY: $83,331 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $65,242 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $57,880 · OtherZANESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER+19 more: $208,157 · Other+19 moreMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $147,239 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIV…OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $29,569 · EducationOHIO WESLEYAN …ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $99,440 · Community ImprovementGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $16,701 · Youth DevelopmentPIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MUSKINGUM COUNTY OHIO: $13,262 · Arts & CultureAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,792 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,463 · HealthThe Animal Shelter Society Inc: $6,231 · Animals
Other$1,032,644Education$176,808Community Improvement$99,440Youth Development$16,701Arts & Culture$13,262Health$6,255Animals$6,231

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $147,239 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC: $99,440 over 6y, 10% of budgetOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $29,569 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $16,701 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKINGUM RESPIRATORY CARE ASSOC: $13,428 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF APPALACHIAN OHIO: $13,263 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MUSKINGUM COUNTY OHIO: $13,262 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetTHE CARR CENTER INC: $8,710 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetThe Animal Shelter Society Inc: $6,231 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,792 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,463 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ZANESVILLE CIVIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM RESPIRATORY CARE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF APPALACHIAN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER & HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MUSKINGUM COUNTY OHIO ↗
  • Who funds THE CARR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Animal Shelter Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

J William & Mary Straker Charitable FdnOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: J William & Mary Straker Charitable Fdn · The Muskingum County Community Foundation · Rogge Cora E Memorial Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Littick Arline Clay Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Littick Arline Clay Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Littick Arline Clay’s filings →

    More from the funding graph