Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lisa P Loeb Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$66kHealth$52kReligion$41kFood & Nutrition$23kHuman Services$19kEducation$13kArts & Culture$8kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASS GENEREL HOSPITAL$10,000
NEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL$10,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$10,000
HEBREW SENIORLIFE$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$7,000
FOUNDATION OF MASS EYE & EAR$5,000
LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH$5,000
FAMILY ACCESS$2,000
SENIOR SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALI$1,000
NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC$1,000
JEWISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION OF MASS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS$1,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$1,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $1k → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $500 → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $500 → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 29 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
23

Total granted

$184k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+40%

Still filing today

45%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue ×18
  • Feeding America
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +23%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • SJ
    SIERRA JENKINS MEMORIAL FD
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel Foundation of Cambridge Inc
Religion
2
Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc

The mission of hsl hospice is to provide exceptional care to terminally ill patients and their families allowing patients to attain the highest quality of life possible. hsl hospice aims to provide the highest quality hospice service that…

Human Services
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The Boston Foundation for Sight Inc

Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.

Human Services
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
9
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Bread-the Walk for Hunger Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cambridge Forum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
24/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED: $17,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATEDTEMPLE ALIYAH: $15,800 · OtherTEMPLE ALIYAHNEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherNEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITALMASS GENEREL HOSPITAL: $10,000 · OtherMASS GENEREL HOSPITALMGH FUND: $8,500 · OtherCJP: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,780 · Other+37 more: $83,750 · Other+37 moreHebrew Senior Life Inc: $42,000 · PhilanthropyHebrew Senior Life IncCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanth…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $6,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $4,250 · Food & NutritionFOOD LINK INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY INC: $6,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthROSIE'S PLACE INC: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterHEBREW COLLEGE: $3,180 · EducationHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$167,930Philanthropy$58,000Food & Nutrition$17,250Health$12,500Housing & Shelter$4,000Education$3,180Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $42,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $4,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $3,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERSTANDING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE FORUM INC: $1,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCAMP BAUERCREST INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DECIBELS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEEDHAM COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LINK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAPPIN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNDERSTANDING OUR DIFFERENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP BAUERCREST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA26.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Joseph and Rae Gann Charitable Foundation · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · GivenGain Foundation USA · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lisa P Loeb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lisa P Loeb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Newton Community Service Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc: 9% of income from government
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Cambridge Forum Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Needham Community Council Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lisa P Loeb’s filings →

More from the funding graph