Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lions Eye Foundation of District 26-M2 Co Ed Marshall

Provide financial aid for eyecare to indigent patients in the st louis area

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of LIONS EYE FOUNDATION OF DISTRICT 26-M2 CO ED MARSHALL’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $81,100 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $104,350 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $47k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID-SOUTH LIONS SIGHT AND HEA$14,000
SAVING KIDSIGHT$12,600
DELTA GAMMA CENTER FOR CHILDR$10,000
MISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH F$10,000
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$8,000
LIONS CLUB INTERNATL FOUND$7,500
WELL LIVING FOUNDATION$7,000
LIONS BUSINESS OPPOR FOR BLIN$6,000
MINDSEYE RADIO$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 8%MINDSEYE RADIO: $6k → 16%LEADER DOG FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$227k · 7 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$227k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+82%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SK
    SAVING KIDSIGHT
    5× · 2021–2025 · $67k · revenue +62%
  • ML
    MID-SOUTH LIONS SIGHT AND HEA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $59k
  • DG
    DELTA GAMMA CENTER FOR CHILDR
    4× · 2021–2025 · $36k

Funded once

  • ML
    MISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • DG
    Delta Gamma Center for Children with Visgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +82%
  • ML
    Mid-South Lions Sight and Hearing Service Inc dba Mid-South Lionsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +384%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Lions Sight Association Inc

The Association's Mission is to fund quality eye treatment for the medically indigent of Alabama. Services provided include providing glasses, surgeries, anesthesia, medically necessary contact lenses, prosthesis, tests and eye medication.

Health
2
Arizona Lions Vision and Hearing Foundation of Md 21

Provide vision and hearing screening and corrective vision and hearing surgeries to individuals within arizona who economically are unable to afford such services.

Health
3
Lions Industries for the Blind Inc

Employment of the blind and visually impaired

Employment
4
Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation of Nh
5
Conexus

Conexus achieves its mission of eliminating poor vision as a barrier to success by identifying children with poor vision through comprehensive vision screenings and connecting those to be found with poor vision to appropriate eye care.

Health
6
Lions of Wyoming Foundation

It is the specific mission of the Lions of Wyoming Foundation to provide quality programs and services to the people of Wyoming for the detection, treatment and rehabilitation of visual impairments and others with special needs. The…

7
Tennessee Lions Charities Inc

To coordinate the vision screening funding support and to perpetuate the Tennessee Lions Eye Center at Vanderbilt Childrens Hospital.

Philanthropy
8
Oregon Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation

Olshf's mission is to screen, treat, save, and restore sight and hearing, in partnership with lions clubs, in order to prevent blindness and deafness for those in need.

Health
9
Greenville Lion Club Activities Fund Inc

Providing eye care and glasses to indigent people in Greenville county and South Carolina Lions vision services

10
Foundation Saving Sight

Dedicated to changing lives by saving sight through support of the Missouri Lions Eye Research Foundation and Saving KidSight

11
Prevent Blindness Texas

to prevent blindness and preserve sight through education, certified vision screening and training, advocacy, research and community and patient service programs

12
La Crosse Lions Charities Inc

Vision screening in local school. Provide eye exams and glasses for needy individuals. Support of organizations that help vision impaired, hearing impaired, disabled and needy individuals. Volunteer for events sponsored by community…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Lions Eye Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Living Well Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MID-SOUTH LIONS SIGHT AND HEA — $58,500 · OtherMID-SOUTH LIONS SIGHT AND HEADELTA GAMMA CENTER FOR CHILDR — $36,000 · OtherDELTA GAMMA CENTER FOR CHILDRLIONS CLUB INTERNATL FOUND — $17,300 · OtherLIONS CLUB INTERNATL FOUNDMISSOURI SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND — $13,800 · OtherMISSOURI SCHOOL FOR THE BLINDMISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH F — $10,000 · OtherMISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH FLIONS BUSINESS OPPOR FOR BLIN — $6,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS — $5,300 · OtherSAVING KIDSIGHT — $67,350 · HealthSAVING KIDSIGHTLIVING WELL FOUNDATION — $14,500 · HealthLIVING WELL FOUNDATIONMISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,000 · HealthMISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH FOUNDATIONDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $8,000 · HealthDelta Gamma Center for Children with VisMid-South Lions Sight and Hearing Service Inc dba Mid-South Lions — $7,000 · HealthMid-South Lions Sight and Hearing Service …LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $20,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOG…MindsEye Radio — $6,000 · Human ServicesMindsEye R…
Other$146,900Health$104,850Human Services$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVING KIDSIGHT — $67,350 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING WELL FOUNDATION — $14,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMISSOURI LIONS EYE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMindsEye Radio — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lions Eye Foundation of District 26-M2 Co Ed Marshall funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lions Eye Foundation of District 26-M2 Co Ed Marshall?

    Find your warmest path to Lions Eye Foundation of District 26-M2 Co Ed Marshall through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph