Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lionel and Bea Harris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$941k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.5MReligion$677kHousing & Shelter$300kEducation$177kHuman Services$139kYouth Development$98kPhilanthropy$82kMembership Benefit$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
  • $250k+2 grants · $660k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIMMARRON VALLEY COOP INC$410,000
OAK GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH$250,000
EPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC$98,160
LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING$32,500
CIMARRON VALLEY ENTREPRENEURS ALLIA$25,000
DRUMRIGHT COMMUNITY FUNDINC$22,889
CUSHING FAIRLAWN NEW ZION CEMETERY$15,000
OKLAHOMA FFA FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,950
CITY OF YALE$12,800
RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY$12,500
DRUMRIGHT COMMUNITY FUND INC$7,000
DRUMRIGHT HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,000
CUSHING GOLF BOOSTER CLUB INC$5,000
PAYNE COUNTY UNITED WAY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $18k → 15%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $13k → 15%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $8k → 15%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $5k → 15%LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $33k → 19%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $2k → 15%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $1k → 15%LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $20k → 19%RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY: $500 → 15%LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $15k → 19%LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $15k → 19%LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 23 repeat orgs$642k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
20

Total granted

$2.6M
$488k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+93%

Still filing today

30%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $165k · revenue +39% · 73% of their budget
  • LI
    LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING
    5× · 2020–2024 · $93k · revenue +97%
  • CP
    CUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $44k · revenue +216% · 50% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • CC
    CUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FDN
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • DP
    DRUMRIGHT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $85k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cushing Regional Hospital Foundation

The purpose is to secure and expand financial aid for capital improvements, expansion of health care facilities and services and contribute to the health care maintenance of the poeple of cushing, oklahoma and the surrounding region.

Health
2
Cushing Rural Fire Corp

Fire suppression and prevention, emergency medical supplies public awareness and education

—
3
Cushing Elementary Pto Inc

Public elementary support

Education
4
Cushing Chamber Foundation for Progress Inc

Community & economic enhancement

Education
5
Oklahoma Scholarship Fund Inc
—
6
Custer County Educational Foundation

To provide scholarship funds for graduating students of custer county district high school following evaluation of applications from the general student population.

Education
7
Cutler-Orosi Community for Youth

promote positive youth development

Youth Development
8
Cummings Africa Foundation
Food & Nutrition
9
Canyon Lake High School Athletic Booster Club

Support student athletics

Education
10
Custer County Foundation Inc

The custer county foundation awards grants to charitable organizations, scholarships to students, and provides support to charitable organizations and potential donors.

Community Improvement
11
Guymon School Educational Foundation
Education
12
Cummings Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epos Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cushing Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIMMARRON VALLEY COOP INC: $1,233,841 · OtherCIMMARRON VALLEY COOP INCOAK GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $493,500 · OtherOAK GROVE BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOUNCIL VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH: $127,000 · OtherCUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FDN: $100,000 · Other+39 more: $596,964 · Other+39 moreCUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $164,500 · Community ImprovementLOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $92,884 · Human ServicesTHE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $46,160 · Human ServicesEPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $98,160 · Youth DevelopmentCUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF PAYNE COUNTY INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyEpic Performance Athletes Inc: $30,840 · ReligionCIMARRON PLAYERS INC DBA CUSHING COMMUNITY THEATRE: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,701,305Community Improvement$164,500Human Services$139,044Youth Development$98,160Philanthropy$51,000Religion$30,840Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $164,500 over 4y, 73% of budgetEPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $98,160 over 1y, 51% of budgetLOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING: $92,884 over 5y, 12% of budgetTHE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC: $46,160 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetCUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 over 5y, 50% of budgetEpic Performance Athletes Inc: $30,840 over 1y, 11% of budgetCIMARRON PLAYERS INC DBA CUSHING COMMUNITY THEATRE: $20,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetOKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PAYNE COUNTY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL TECH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CUSHING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds EPOS OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC OF GREATER CUSHING ↗
  • Who funds THE RIGHT PATH RIDING ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CUSHING PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Epic Performance Athletes Inc ↗
  • Who funds CIMARRON PLAYERS INC DBA CUSHING COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PAYNE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Cushing Quarterback Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lionel and Bea Harris Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lionel and Bea Harris Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lionel and Bea Harris Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lionel and Bea Harris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lionel and Bea Harris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph