· Private foundation
Lillian Lorber Charitable Trust Greenberg Traurig LLP
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Opportunity Project Inc | $10,000 |
| Jewish Family and Vocational Servic | $10,000 |
| Spectrum for Living | $10,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $10,000 |
| St Jude Children's Research Hospita | $10,000 |
| National Museum of American Jewish | $10,000 |
| Rutgers University Hillel | $10,000 |
| Birthright Israel Foundation | $8,000 |
| Ronald McDonald House | $8,000 |
| Make a Wish Foundation - New Jersey | $8,000 |
| Anti Defamation League | $8,000 |
| Mazon A Jewish Response to Hunger | $8,000 |
| Zahal Shalom Corp | $8,000 |
| NJ Fed of Young Mens Hebrew Assoc a | $8,000 |
| Spectrum for Living | $8,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.
25 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MAMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger7× · 2019–2025 · $49k · revenue +61%
- OPOPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +26%
- DIDOROT INC7× · 2019–2025 · $47k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- EEversightone grant, 2021 · $6k
- HHadassahone grant, 2019 · $5k
- TATHE AUSCHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -15%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Zahal Shalom Corp ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
- Who funds HAROLD WARP PIONEER VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds THE AUSCHWITZ JEWISH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Lillian Lorber Charitable Trust Greenberg Traurig LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lillian Lorber Charitable Trust Greenberg Traurig LLP. Bigger dots raise more.
- Autism New Jersey Inc: 44% of income from government
- Opportunity Project Inc: 6% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Lillian Lorber Charitable Trust Greenberg Traurig LLP’s filings →