Skip to content
Life Restoration Network at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Life Restoration Network

The purpose of our non-profit's annual golf tournament is to raise funds and awareness for multiple causes, supporting several organizations in need.

$211k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$576kReligion$48kHealth$38kPhilanthropy$37kCrime & Legal$30kHousing & Shelter$20kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$206k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$125,000
MISC$24,036
STREETSIDE SHOWERS$10,000
RECLAIM611$10,000
RYAN PALMER FOUNDATION$10,000
KAIZEN ADAPTIVE TRAINING$10,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIORS$10,000
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STREETSIDE SHOWERS: $10k → 5%SPECIAL OPERATIONS WOUNDED WARRIORS: $10k → 13%STREETSIDE SHOWERS: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 5 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$683k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+2%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DL
    DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $576k · revenue +21%
  • RI
    RECLAIM611 INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • SS
    STREETSIDE SHOWERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • RO
    RING OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $48k
  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
2
Ryan Saves Lives
Health
3
Cj Lomas Recovery Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
5
Sol Foundation
—
6
Ryans Love of Life Foundation
Health
7
Lone Star Foundation
—
8
Ryan Shaw Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
10
Hope4vets
Housing & Shelter
11
The 6 Foundation Group

The mission of The 6 Foundation is to treat and educate veterans, first responders and survivors of traumatic exposure through state of the art multi-disciplinary rehabilitation.

—
12
A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South County Community Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Bolos Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $576,096 · Public BenefitDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONRING OF HOPE: $47,898 · OtherRING OF HOPEBOLOS FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherBOLOS FOUNDATIONMISC: $24,036 · OtherMISCPTSD FOUNDATION DALLAS CHAPTER: $20,000 · OtherPTSD FOUNDATION DA…RECLAIM611 INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalSTREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSOWW Corp: $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthKAIZEN ADAPTIVE TRAINING LLC: $10,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $7,500 · HealthRYAN PALMER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Youth Development
Public Benefit$576,096Other$128,934Crime & Legal$30,000Human Services$30,000Health$27,500Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $576,096 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetBOLOS FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetRECLAIM611 INC: $30,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetSTREETSIDE SHOWERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOWW Corp: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRYAN PALMER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKAIZEN ADAPTIVE TRAINING LLC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Life Restoration Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Life Restoration Network. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Life Restoration Network?

    Find your warmest path to Life Restoration Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Life Restoration Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home