Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K) Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$273kArts & Culture$260kReligion$47kEducation$4kHuman Services$2kMembership Benefit$522Science & Tech$460Animals$428Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150
Median grant
3
States reached
$194k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWCASTLE LIFESPACE FOUNDATION$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$250
Individual grant recipient$208
CONGREGATION SINAI$150
RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN$100
FRIENDS OF GREENWOOD CEMETERY$100
MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$100
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $203) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $50 → 8%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50 → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50 → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $27 → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $26 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
CA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K) Charitable Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K) Charitable Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$313k · 19 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +123% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$313k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+123%
+67%

Still filing today

47%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SARASOTA INSTITUTE OF LIFETIME LEARNING INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $620 · revenue +157%
  • MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $460 · revenue +274%
  • Tikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $350 · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • NP
    NEWCASTLE PLACE TMAF-LIFESPACE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • LF
    LIFESPACE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • HC
    HEBREW COLLEGE VIA RAZOO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $106
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
8
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Unlocking the secrets of life itself is the driving force behind the salk institute. our team of world-class, award-winning scientists pushes boundaries of knowledge in areas such as neuroscience, cancer research, aging, immunobiology,…

Science & Tech
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Gainesville Jewish Student Foundation Inc

The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel

—
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $179,300 · OtherSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INCSARASOTA ORCHESTRA: $80,288 · OtherSARASOTA ORCHESTRACONGREGATION SINAI: $42,284 · OtherCONGREGATION SINAI+25 more: $12,885 · OtherMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $95,026 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INCCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $90,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $88,030 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INCTikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc: $350 · ReligionThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $225 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $48 · EnvironmentJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER INC: $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $80 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $25 · HealthSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $153 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $50 · Human ServicesRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $100 · EducationThe Florida State University Foundation Inc: $100 · Education
Other$314,757Philanthropy$273,056Religion$350Environment$273Health$255Human Services$203Education$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $179,300 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $95,026 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC: $88,030 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,625 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSARASOTA INSTITUTE OF LIFETIME LEARNING INC: $620 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $203 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $153 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Florida State University Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $80 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $48 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SARASOTA-MANATEE INC ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA INSTITUTE OF LIFETIME LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lubar Family Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lubar Family Foundation Inc · Harri Hoffmann Family Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K) Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K) Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lieberman (Jay M & Joan K)’s filings →

More from the funding graph