Skip to content

· Public charity

Library System of Lancaster County

Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the member libraries in order to effectively serve our communities

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$478k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$13M
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $478k
$98,245
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY$478,003
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY$206,631
EPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY$202,714
LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY$149,538
ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY$140,040
INTERCOURSE LIBRARY$134,493
MILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY$98,245
QUARRYVILLE LIBRARY$91,358
ADAMSTOWN AREA LIBRARY$82,993
ELANCO LIBRARY$80,249
COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY$77,365
MOORES MEMORIAL LIBRARY$76,844
STRASBURG-HEISLER LIBRARY$73,575
MANHEIM COMMUNITY LIBRARY$57,521
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $491k → 9%QUARRYVILLE LIBRARY: $91k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $478k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $460k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $449k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $446k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $446k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $434k → 9%LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $428k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $208k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $207k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $201k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $167k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $162k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $137k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $136k → 9%MANHEIM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY: $136k → 9%EPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $203k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $197k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $195k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $186k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $172k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $167k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $166k → 9%EPHRATA LIBRARY: $166k → 9%INTERCOURSE LIBRARY: $136k → 9%INTERCOURSE LIBRARY: $134k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $111k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $109k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $109k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $96k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $94k → 9%PEQUEA VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $94k → 9%MILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY: $98k → 9%MILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY: $98k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $150k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $140k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $145k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $135k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $124k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $113k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $122k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $105k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $119k → 9%ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $103k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $118k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $118k → 9%LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY: $118k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$13M
$0

Still filing today

93%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +15%
  • EP
    EPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +36%
  • LP
    LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +46%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Eccles-Lesher Memorial Library Association
    —
    2
    Indian Valley Public Library Foundation of Friends
    Philanthropy
    3
    Mountain Lakes Free Public Library

    The mission of the Mountain Lakes Free Public Library is to provide free access to books, periodicals, magazines, audio, video, digital and internet media

    Education
    4
    Parkesburg Free Library

    The mission of the Parkesburg Free Library is to provide the Parkesburg Borough and surrounding communities with book materials and information necessary for personal growth and life long learning. We seek to guide community and business…

    —
    5
    Bridgeville Public Library

    Bridgeville Public Library operates as a public library that provides books, videos, periodicals and other educational materials for area residents to use and borrow.

    —
    6
    Shippensburg Public Library

    The shippensburg public library exists to provide cultural vitality and lifelong learning through open access to reading, reference, programs, and community space.

    Education
    7
    Elkland Area Community Library

    Operate and maintain a free community library for purposes of providing the community of Elkland, PA and surrounding area with books, multi-media and information services.

    Education
    8
    Murrysville Community Library

    The Murrysville Community Library serves the communitys evolving informational needs. We connect people with ideas and information, promote lifelong learning, and help build the community.

    Education
    9
    Palmerton Area Library Association

    Operate a public library

    —
    10
    Penn Hills Library

    A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

    Education
    11
    Morris Plains Library Association

    Public Library providing books and computer network to the public

    Education
    12
    Millvale Community Library

    To ensure the preservation and transmission of society's knowledge, history and culture, and to provide the people of Millvale with free and open access to information for education, recreation and reference.

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eastern Lancaster County Library; the most unlike its peers is Strasburg-Heisler Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    6
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    11/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3,634,873 · EducationLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARYEPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1,451,662 · EducationEPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARYELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $863,389 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARYADAMSTOWN AREA LIBRARY: $602,275 · EducationADAMSTOWN AREA LIBRARYMOORES MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $477,260 · EducationMOORES MEMORIAL LIBRARYMANHEIM TOWNSHIP: $1,355,103 · OtherMANHEIM TOWNSHIPLITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $1,013,782 · OtherLITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INCMILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY: $642,202 · OtherMILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARYQUARRYVILLE LIBRARY CENTER: $618,769 · OtherQUARRYVILLE LIBRARY CENTEREASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY: $554,586 · OtherEASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARYSTRASBURG-HEISLER LIBRARY: $478,809 · OtherSTRASBURG-HEISLER LIBRARYCOLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $450,694 · OtherCOLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONMANHEIM COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $420,129 · OtherMANHEIM COMMUNITY LIBRARYINTERCOURSE LIBRARY INC: $886,950 · Arts & Culture
    Education$7,029,459Other$5,534,074Arts & Culture$886,950

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3,634,873 over 8y, 22% of budgetEPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1,451,662 over 8y, 20% of budgetLITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $1,013,782 over 8y, 21% of budgetINTERCOURSE LIBRARY INC: $886,950 over 8y, 52% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $863,389 over 8y, 18% of budgetMILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY: $642,202 over 8y, 21% of budgetQUARRYVILLE LIBRARY CENTER: $618,769 over 8y, 25% of budgetADAMSTOWN AREA LIBRARY: $602,275 over 8y, 21% of budgetEASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY: $554,586 over 8y, 28% of budgetSTRASBURG-HEISLER LIBRARY: $478,809 over 8y, 34% of budgetMOORES MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $477,260 over 8y, 66% of budgetCOLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $450,694 over 8y, 46% of budgetMANHEIM COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $420,129 over 8y, 31% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds EPHRATA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds LITITZ PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
    • Who funds INTERCOURSE LIBRARY INC ↗
    • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds MILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds QUARRYVILLE LIBRARY CENTER ↗
    • Who funds ADAMSTOWN AREA LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds EASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds STRASBURG-HEISLER LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds MOORES MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds MANHEIM COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Lancaster County Community FoundationPA30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Ashland Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Library System of Lancaster County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Library System of Lancaster County. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24
    no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–24
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Library System of Lancaster County?

      Find your warmest path to Library System of Lancaster County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Library System of Lancaster County’s filings →

      More from the funding graph