Skip to content
Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inc

Plan and host fundraising events to raise monies for non-profit agencies within cobb, cherokee, fulton, and pauling counties, in support of georgia community needs

$288k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$658kHealth$222kCrime & Legal$153kFood & Nutrition$153kAnimals$68kHousing & Shelter$68kReligion$15kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $255,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $287,511 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,893 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$28,402
Median grant
1
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFEPATH CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY$28,402
WAREHOUSE OF HOPE$28,402
MCKENNA FARMS$28,402
UNITED MILITARY CARE$28,402
MUST MINISTRIES$28,402
NEXT STEP MINISTRIES$28,402
CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME$28,402
THE DRAKE HOUSE$28,402
CASA PAULDING$28,402
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $606k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $30k → 6%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $30k → 6%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $28k → 6%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $25k → 6%MOSTLY MUTTS: $30k → 8%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $20k → 6%NEXT STEP MINISTRIES: $15k → 6%CASA PAULDING: $30k → 8%MOSTLY MUTTS: $20k → 8%CASA PAULDING: $30k → 8%ADVOCACY FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $30k → 8%MOSTLY MUTTS: $9k → 8%CASA PAULDING: $28k → 8%UNITED MILITARY CARE: $30k → 8%CASA PAULDING: $25k → 8%UNITED MILITARY CARE: $30k → 8%CASA PAULDING: $20k → 8%UNITED MILITARY CARE: $28k → 8%CASA PAULDING: $9k → 8%UNITED MILITARY CARE: $25k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 8%CALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $28k → 8%CALVARY CHILDRENS HOME: $25k → 8%CALVARY CHILDRENS HOME: $9k → 8%DAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in GA; by stated purpose, 59%.

Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$1.2M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-16%

Still filing today

100%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WAREHOUSE OF HOPE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +65%
  • SC
    SafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +58%
  • NS
    Next Step Ministries Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • AF
    ADVOCACY FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -96% · 78% of their budget
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -59%
  • DD
    DAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant Care Services Inc

Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…

Human Services
2
Adoption Authority Inc

Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.

—
3
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…

Civil Rights
4
Atlanta Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Atlanta Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc.'s mission: To educate the community and to recruit, train and supervise court appointed volunteers to advocate for the best interest, safety and permanent placement of abused and neglected…

Civil Rights
5
Georgia Agape Inc

Georgia agape's mission is to provide professional social services as a compassionate christian outreach to children and families in order to enhance their prospects for a better and brighter future.

—
6
Dougherty County Casa Inc

Dougherty County CASA, Inc. supports children who have experienced abuse or neglect by providing specially trained community volunteers to advocate for their best interests -- promoting their safety, stability, and permanent connections to…

Civil Rights
7
Sharehouse Inc

The Organization is a non-profit organization providing crisis intervention and the continuum of care to address the causes and effects of family violence.

—
8
Carroll County Child Advocacy Center Inc

The Carroll County Child Advocacy Center exists to champion the needs of sexually, physically, and emotionally abused children in Carroll, Haralson and Heard counties through prevention, intervention and collaboration.

—
9
Advocates for Children Inc

Our new mission is: advocates for children is an organization of dedicated, skilled professionals and compassionate volunteers committed to the well-being of children, youth and families. through comprehensive advocacy and unwavering…

—
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates

To be the voice for children who have been victims of abuse and/or neglect. Our vision is to serve every child in the Cheaha Region by providing them with a caring and competent trained volunteer.

Crime & Legal
11
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
12
Family Counseling Center of Central Georgia Inc

Strengthen and preserve the well-being of individuals, couples, and families through easy, affordable access to professional counseling services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Advocacy for Foster Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Next Step Ministries Inc: $148,488 · Human ServicesNext Step Ministries IncCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF PAULDING COUNTY INC: $142,563 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF PAULDING COUNTY INCMust Ministries Inc: $122,563 · Human ServicesMust Ministries IncUNITED MILITARY CARE INC: $113,488 · Human ServicesUNITED MILITARY CARE INCCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $92,231 · Human ServicesCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOMEMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption Inc: $59,407 · Human ServicesMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption IncADVOCACY FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $29,754 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesSafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $153,488 · OtherSafePath Childr…EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA: $20,000 · OtherEPILEPSY FOUNDA…RACHEAL'S REST INC: $9,075 · OtherMcEachern High School: $7,000 · OtherMcKenna Farms Therapy Services: $122,563 · HealthMcKenna Farms T…CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEAL…SHEPHERD CENTER INC: $9,075 · HealthWAREHOUSE OF HOPE INC: $153,488 · Food & NutritionWAREHOUSE OF…The Drake House Inc: $67,809 · Housing & ShelterCITY OF REFUGE: $15,000 · ReligionBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $9,075 · Youth DevelopmentANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE INC: $9,075 · Animals
Human Services$728,494Other$189,563Health$181,638Food & Nutrition$153,488Housing & Shelter$67,809Religion$15,000Youth Development$9,075Animals$9,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAREHOUSE OF HOPE INC: $153,488 over 8y, 11% of budgetSafePath Children's Advocacy Center Inc: $153,488 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetNext Step Ministries Inc: $148,488 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF PAULDING COUNTY INC: $142,563 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetMust Ministries Inc: $122,563 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMcKenna Farms Therapy Services: $122,563 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED MILITARY CARE INC: $113,488 over 6y, 36% of budgetCALVARY CHILDREN'S HOME: $92,231 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Drake House Inc: $67,809 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMostly Mutts Animal Rescue and Adoption Inc: $59,407 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCACY FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $29,754 over 1y, 78% of budgetDAVIS DIRECTION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc: $9,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $9,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRACHEAL'S REST INC: $9,075 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetANGELS AMONG US PET RESCUE INC: $9,075 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carmax FoundationThe Community Foundat…Cobb Emc Foundation I…Georgia Power Foundat…Cobb Community Founda…Bennett Thrasher Foun…The Arthur M Blank Fa…Mightycause Charitabl…Synchrony FoundationThe Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…
Carmax FoundationVA20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carmax Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Cobb Emc Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Cobb Community Foundation Inc · Bennett Thrasher Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lge Community Outreach Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $401k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lge Community Outreach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home