Skip to content
Levtch Unca Etal Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Levtch Unca Etal Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$209kEducation$83kPhilanthropy$83kHealth$26k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$10,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC$10,800
UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC$10,800
JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE$10,800
CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA$8,800
THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$8,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $13k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $9k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 12%UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 12%WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $15k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $15k → 12%WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $13k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $13k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $12k → 12%WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $12k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $11k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $11k → 12%WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $11k → 12%WNC JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $11k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $11k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $11k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $10k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $10k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $9k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $9k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $9k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $9k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $9k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $9k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $9k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $7k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $7k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $6k → 12%JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $6k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $4k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $4k → 12%MISSION HOSPITAL INC: $9k → 12%THE CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $4k → 12%MISSION HOSPITAL INC: $9k → 12%CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$319k · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$319k
$0

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $83k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $83k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $63k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    0/2
    Grantees still filing
    0/2
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $83,306 · OtherUNC ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INCWNC Jewish Federation: $83,306 · OtherWNC Jewish FederationJEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLE: $83,306 · OtherJEWISH COMM CENTER OF ASHEVILLECONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILA: $62,852 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH HA TEPHILACONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $62,852 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL+1 more: $8,800 · OtherMISSION HOSPITAL INC: $17,600 · Health
    Other$384,422Health$17,600

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWNC Jewish Federation: $83,306 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL INC: $17,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds WNC Jewish Federation ↗
    • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile Foundation
    Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Levtch Unca Etal Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home