Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leslie J Raffel Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Education$3.3MYouth Development$520kInternational$250kCivil Rights$206kScience & Tech$205kReligion$122kArts & Culture$70kHealth$32kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $302k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.1M
$201,922
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,983,745
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$368,943
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIV$250,000
ALL STARS PROJECT$201,922
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$100,412
CHABAD OF PURDUE UNIV$30,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
ALL STARS PROJECT$2,321
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $2k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIV: $250k → 17%SIGMA ALPHA MU: $15k → 5%INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2.0M → 18%CHABAD OF PURDUE UNIV: $30k → 19%METTAWA OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $100 → 8%ACTS OF KINDNESS CABARET: $3k → 14%CONGREGATION NER SHALOM: $6k → 9%ALL STARS PROJECT: $306k → 17%SIGMA ALPHA MU: $10k → 5%INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 18%CHABAD OF PURDUE UNIV: $25k → 19%ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $25k → 8%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3k → 14%CONGREGATION NER SHALOM: $3k → 9%ALL STARS PROJECT: $202k → 17%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $25k → 8%ACTS OF KINDNESS CABARET: $3k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $10k → 17%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $10k → 8%THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%ALL STARS PROJECT: $2k → 17%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $6k → 19%AM SHALOM: $16k → 14%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%AM SHALOM: $3k → 14%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%WBEZ CHICAGO: $1k → 14%HILLEL FOUNDATION: $500 → 19%TEMPLE BETH EL: $6k → 14%PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $369k → 19%LES TURNER ALS FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDTION: $205k → 19%LES TURNER ALS FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $201k → 19%LITTLE CITY: $25k → 14%PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $200k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Leslie J Raffel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 3% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 14%.

Leslie J Raffel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 13 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-5%

Still filing today

46%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Purdue Research Foundation
    3× · 2023–2026 · $770k · revenue +39%
  • AS
    ALL STARS PROJECT INC
    2× · 2025–2026 · $520k · revenue +58%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2022–2026 · $206k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $205k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Art Center of Highland Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University Foundation: $2,483,745 · EducationIndiana University FoundationPurdue Research Foundation: $770,359 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation+1 more: $4,000 · EducationALL STARS PROJECT INC: $519,755 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PRO…THE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ART CENTE…Individual grant recipient: $204,887 · OtherIndividual…CHABAD OF PURDUE UNIV: $55,000 · OtherCHABAD OF …TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherTRUSTEES O…THE HILLEL FOUNDATION AT PURDUE: $32,912 · OtherTHE HILLEL…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual…AM SHALOM: $19,000 · Other+6 more: $28,400 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $250,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $205,544 · Civil RightsREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$3,258,104Arts & Culture$579,755Other$440,199International$250,000Civil Rights$205,544Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $770,359 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $205,544 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $60,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HILLEL FOUNDATION AT PURDUE: $32,912 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK ↗
  • Who funds THE HILLEL FOUNDATION AT PURDUE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leslie J Raffel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leslie J Raffel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leslie J Raffel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph