Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leonard J and Irene Brown Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$75kHealth$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kArts & Culture$27kYouth Development$26kFood & Nutrition$21kPhilanthropy$20kHousing & Shelter$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAPORTE COUNTY$5,000
DISCOVERY SCHOOL PAC$5,000
DUNES LEATHERNECKS DETACHMENT 1056$4,500
VALPARAISO KIWANIS FOUNDATION$4,000
HOOSIER VALLEY RAILROAD MUSEUM$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
PSI IOTA XI$2,500
DUNEBROOK$2,000
WTTW$2,000
UNITED WAY OF LAPORTE COUNTY$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,000
CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%OHIO'S HOSPICE OF DAYTON: $100 → 14%SHARE FOUNDATION: $100 → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS: $3k → 15%HILLTOP NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1k → 9%HILLTOP NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1k → 9%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
IL
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
NE
VA
AZ
KS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 40 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
37

Total granted

$233k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-9%

Still filing today

38%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +25%
  • IC
    INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +66%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +273%

Funded once

  • DC
    DISCOVERY CHARTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • ND
    NORTH DALLAS YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • PF
    PURDUE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
2
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc

To foster and encourage private philanthropic giving, to enhance the spirit of community, and to improve the quality of life in the wayne county, indiana, area now and for future generations.

Philanthropy
7
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
8
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
9
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
10
Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago

Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.

—
11
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unity Foundation of La Porte County; the most unlike its peers is Pines Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWEST: $19,000 · OtherPURDUE UNIVERSITY NORTHWESTIndividual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDISCOVERY CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER LAPORTE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · OtherPSI IOTA XI: $9,500 · OtherDUNEBROOK INC: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $7,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other+60 more: $122,950 · Other+60 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,500 · HealthAmerican H…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,790 · HealthAMERICAN C…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesHILLTOP NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSHARE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · Human Services+2 more: $200 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureArizona Theatre Company: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHOOSIER VALLEY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBEVERLY SHORES MUSEUM AND ART GALLERY INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITY FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE COUNTY: $4,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Education
Other$218,050Health$28,290Human Services$16,900Youth Development$13,000Arts & Culture$12,000Philanthropy$11,000Education$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $13,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER LAPORTE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE COUNTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPINES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetArizona Theatre Company: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation for Iron and Steel Technology: $3,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALPARAISO KIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBEVERLY SHORES VOLUNTEER FIREMEN I: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHOOSIER VALLEY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHILLTOP NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLakeshore Paws Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER LAPORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY FOUNDATION OF LA PORTE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PINES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds Association for Iron and Steel Technology ↗
  • Who funds VALPARAISO KIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY SHORES VOLUNTEER FIREMEN I ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER VALLEY RAILROAD MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nisource Charitable FoundationOH22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nisource Charitable Foundation · John W Anderson Foundation · Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · Unity Foundation of la Porte County · Porter County Community Foundation Inc · The Barker Welfare Foundation · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Duneland Health Council · United Way of Greater Laporte County Inc · Patrick a & Mary B O'Neil Foundation · Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation · Early Learning Indiana Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leonard J and Irene Brown Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leonard J and Irene Brown Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard J and Irene Brown’s filings →

More from the funding graph