Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leona S Hudson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$146kEducation$82kReligion$30kYouth Development$20kHealth$10kEnvironment$5kCrime & Legal$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$11,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$706k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION$13,000
ATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADEMY$11,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%NORTHSIDE EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE HOLDINGS: $10k → 10%PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $25k → 12%PRINCE AVENUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 6%ATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $12k → 13%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 27%BEL CANTO: $5k → 14%NORTHSIDE EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE HOLDINGS: $800 → 10%HIGHLANDS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $20k → 12%PRINCE AVENUE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $800 → 6%ATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADAMY: $4k → 13%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $13k → 27%BEL CANTO: $3k → 14%CHURCH OF INCARNATION: $10k → 12%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $20k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $11k → 27%BEL CANTO: $3k → 14%CHURCH OF INCARNATION: $10k → 12%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $10k → 27%BEL CANTO: $3k → 14%CHURCH OF INCARNATION: $10k → 12%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5k → 15%BEL CANTO: $3k → 14%HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5k → 15%BEL CANTO: $1k → 14%HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $1k → 15%HIGHLANDS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10k → 15%HIGHLANDS BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10k → 15%BASCOM ART CENTER: $3k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $300 → 15%TOWN OF HIGHLANDS: $2k → 12%VSU FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%HIGHLANDS PLAYHOUSE: $2k → 12%BASCOM ART CENTER: $1k → 12%BASCOM ART CENTER: $1k → 12%HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS LAND TRUST: $1k → 12%HIGHLANDS-CASHIERS LAND TRUST: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$294k · 11 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$294k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+76%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $54k · revenue +36%
  • PA
    Prince Avenue Christian School Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k · revenue +86%
  • TB
    The Bascom Corporation
    3× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • PL
    PISGAH LEGAL SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +76%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • HB
    Highlands Biological Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Highland Christian Academy

Education, K-5 through 12th grade

Education
2
The Piedmont Arts Association

To provide experiences in the visual and performing arts

—
3
Blue Ridge National Heritage Area Inc

Preserving, interpreting, and developing the heritage resources of the North Carolina mountains.

Environment
4
Counseling Center of Highlands

The Counseling Center strives to strengthen families and individuals by providing access to quality mental health services regardless of financial ability.

Health
5
Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project

To help local farms thrive, link farmers to markets and supporters, and build healthy communities through connections to local food.

Environment
6
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
7
Highland Park Conservancy Inc

The mission is to preserve Highland Park's unique heritage and to promote its vast horticultural, educational and recreational resources. Continued on Schedule OWe support planning, management and restoration, and engage the community…

Environment
8
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
9
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
10
Highpoint Center for Printmaking

Highpoint Center for Printmaking is dedicated to advancing the art of printmaking. We create pathways for artists, learners, and the public to increase their understanding and appreciation of printmaking through artistic and educational…

Arts & Culture
11
Nantahala Health Foundation

Improving health and well-being for those living in westernmost North Carolina.

Health
12
Southern Appalachian Wilderness Stewards

SAWS sets standards of excellence that inspire, connect, and equip people to steward wild public lands. SAWS provides trail maintenance, restoration, construction, ranger patrols, and disaster recovery in remote and wilderness areas;…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pisgah Legal Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $90,000 · OtherANNETTE TURNER CENTER FOR THE ARTSCHURCH OF INCARNATION: $30,000 · OtherCHURCH OF INCARNATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $20,300 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $11,500 · OtherATLANTA CLASSICAL ACADEMYNORTHSIDE EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE HOLDINGS: $10,800 · OtherNORTHSIDE EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE HOLDINGS+6 more: $12,300 · Other+6 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $54,250 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEO…Prince Avenue Christian School Inc: $5,800 · EducationPrince Avenue Christi…Performing Arts Center Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePerforming Arts Cen…The Bascom Corporation: $4,500 · Arts & CultureThe Bascom Corporat…Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $5,000 · Crime & LegalHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $2,000 · Environment
Other$190,900Education$60,050Arts & Culture$54,500Health$10,000Crime & Legal$5,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $54,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPerforming Arts Center Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPrince Avenue Christian School Inc: $5,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bascom Corporation: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHighlands Biological Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Performing Arts Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Prince Avenue Christian School Inc ↗
  • Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Bascom Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Biological Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Highlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ashcourt Family Foundation IncFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ashcourt Family Foundation Inc · Dan and Merrie Boone Foundation Inc · Al Williams Jr Family Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Farmer Lee Foundation Inc · The Britton Foundation · The Inman Foundation · The H Foundation · Boger-Owen Foundation · Thomas C & Ann L Webster Charitable Foundation · The Klamon Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leona S Hudson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leona S Hudson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leona S Hudson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leona S Hudson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leona S Hudson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph