Skip to content
Leon Rachel Corp at a glance

· Public charity

Leon Rachel Corp

Promoting the common good and general welfare of the community through advocacy communications outreach and other activities related to advancing commonsense policy solutions that benefit all Americans.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
  • $250k+14 grants · $17M
$500,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)$5,000,000
Republican Jewish Coalition$3,250,000
With Honor Action Inc$3,000,000
American Prosperity Alliance$1,500,000
Common Sense Leadership Fund Inc$750,000
Right Vote$500,000
Winning for Women Inc$500,000
Coalition for American Excellence$500,000
Stand for America Inc$500,000
New Heights for America Inc$500,000
314Action$350,000
Center for Campaign Innovation$250,000
New York Solidarity Network Inc$250,000
RightCount Action Inc$250,000
FDD Action$100,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%New York Solidarity Network Inc: $250k → 17%State Armor Action: $100k → 10%Stand for America Inc: $500k → 16%With Honor Action Inc: $3.0M → 14%Coalition for American Excellence: $500k → 6%Common Sense Leadership Fund Inc: $750k → 7%RightCount Action Inc: $250k → 9%New Heights for America Inc: $500k → 9%Republican Main Street Partnership: $100k → 14%American Prosperity Alliance: $1.5M → 6%Center for Campaign Innovation: $250k → 9%Winning for Women Inc: $500k → 14%American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC): $5.0M → 14%Republican Jewish Coalition: $3.3M → 14%314Action: $350k → 14%Right Vote: $500k → 14%FDD Action: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
2
Foreign Policy for America

Foreign Policy For America is a nonpartisan advocacy organization founded to strengthen support for principled American engagement in the world.

—
3
United States Public Policy Council

To engage in research, education and public awareness campaigns relating to the national security, intelligence and foreign and national policy of the United States of America, and freedom in America and the World. Also to engage in those…

—
4
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

—
5
Senate Opportunity Fund

Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.

—
6
Secure Democracy Usa

Secure Democracy USA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to build stronger elections, state by state.

Civil Rights
7
Minnesota Action Network Inc

To create, encourage, and promote center right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism, and strong policies in the state of MN, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which…

Public Benefit
8
Center for a New American Security Inc

The mission of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is to develop strong, pragmatic and principled national security and defense policies building on the the expertise and experience of its staff and advisors. CNAS engages policy…

International
9
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
10
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
11
Common Sense Policy Institute

The Common Sense Policy Institute works to inform the American public of dysfunction in the government by identifying government waste, fraud, and abuse through engaging in nonpartisan analysis, study, and research relating to government…

Public Benefit
12
American Action Network Inc

The American Action Network creates, encourages and promotes center-right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism and strong national security.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rightcount Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Republican Main Street Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
0/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION: $3,250,000 · OtherREPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITIONAmerican Prosperity Alliance: $1,500,000 · OtherAmerican Prosperity AllianceCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC: $750,000 · OtherCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INCCoalition for American Excellence: $500,000 · OtherCoalition for American ExcellenceNew Heights for America: $500,000 · OtherNew Heights for AmericaWINNING FOR WOMEN INC: $500,000 · OtherWINNING FOR WOMEN INC+4 more: $850,000 · Other+4 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $5,000,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COM…314ACTION: $350,000 · International314ACTIONWITH HONOR ACTION INC: $3,000,000 · Civil RightsWITH HONOR ACTION INCRight Vote Inc: $500,000 · Civil RightsRight Vote IncSTAND FOR AMERICA INC: $500,000 · Community ImprovementFDD Action: $100,000 · Community ImprovementREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $100,000 · Public Benefit
Other$7,850,000International$5,350,000Civil Rights$3,500,000Community Improvement$600,000Public Benefit$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $5,000,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetREPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION: $3,250,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetWITH HONOR ACTION INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetAmerican Prosperity Alliance: $1,500,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC: $750,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSTAND FOR AMERICA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetRight Vote Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCoalition for American Excellence: $500,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNew Heights for America: $500,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWINNING FOR WOMEN INC: $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budget314ACTION: $350,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCenter for Campaign Innovation: $250,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetNEW YORK SOLIDARITY NETWORK INC: $250,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetSTATE ARMOR ACTION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFDD Action: $100,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ardleigh Impact CorpAmerican Action Netwo…The Concord Fund
Ardleigh Impact CorpVA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ardleigh Impact Corp · American Action Network Inc · The Concord Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leon Rachel Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leon Rachel Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leon Rachel Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Leon Rachel Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leon Rachel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home