Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Ardleigh Impact Corp

Promoting the common good and general welfare of the community through advocacy communications outreach and other activities related to advancing commonsense policy solutions that benefit all Americans.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.6M
$200,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Right Vote$1,100,000
With Honor Action Inc$450,000
Winning for Women Inc$450,000
New Heights for America Inc$400,000
Veterans on Duty Inc$350,000
RightCount Action Inc$345,000
Aurora Venture Inc$300,000
Americans 4 Security Inc$250,000
Governing Majority Education Fund$200,000
Center for Campaign Innovation$200,000
American Action Network$200,000
AR2 Inc$170,000
American Unity Fund$125,000
Common Sense Leadership Fund$125,000
National Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc$125,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Action Network: $200k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senate Opportunity Fund

Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.

—
2
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
3
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
4
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
5
Secure Democracy Usa

Secure Democracy USA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to build stronger elections, state by state.

Civil Rights
6
Americans for Limited Government Inc

Advocate for various issues relating to limited government.

Civil Rights
7
Minnesota Action Network Inc

To create, encourage, and promote center right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism, and strong policies in the state of MN, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which…

Public Benefit
8
American Exceptionalism Institute

The organization engaged in public communications and issue education activities related to national security, the protection of life, and tax and spending issues.

Community Improvement
9
Election Watch Inc

Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.

Civil Rights
10
Advancing American Freedom Inc

Advancing american freedom promotes and defends the successful policies of recent years that yielded unprecedented prosperity at home and restored america's strength abroad, while elevating traditional american values. aaf serves the…

International
11
Stand True America

The purpose of the organization is to advocate for the collective interests of American citizens and defend the nation against enemies and critics of the United States.

—
12
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rightcount Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Republican Main Street Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
0/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WINNING FOR WOMEN INC — $450,000 · OtherWINNING FOR WOMEN INCNew Heights for America — $400,000 · OtherNew Heights for AmericaVETERANS ON DUTY INC — $350,000 · OtherVETERANS ON DUTY INCRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INC — $345,000 · OtherRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INCAurora Venture Inc — $300,000 · OtherAurora Venture IncAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INC — $250,000 · OtherAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INCGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $200,000 · OtherGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUNDCenter for Campaign Innovation — $200,000 · OtherCenter for Campaign InnovationAR2 INC — $170,000 · OtherAMERICAN UNITY FUND INC — $125,000 · OtherNational Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc — $125,000 · OtherCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC — $125,000 · Other+4 more — $300,000 · Other+4 moreRight Vote Inc — $1,100,000 · Civil RightsRight Vote IncWITH HONOR ACTION INC — $450,000 · Civil RightsWITH HONOR ACTION INCAmerican Action Network Inc — $200,000 · Human ServicesREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP — $100,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN EDUCATION COALITION INC — $100,000 · Education
Other$3,340,000Civil Rights$1,550,000Human Services$200,000Public Benefit$100,000Education$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRight Vote Inc — $1,100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetWITH HONOR ACTION INC — $450,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetWINNING FOR WOMEN INC — $450,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNew Heights for America — $400,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVETERANS ON DUTY INC — $350,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INC — $345,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $200,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetAmerican Action Network Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Campaign Innovation — $200,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetAR2 INC — $170,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetAMERICAN UNITY FUND INC — $125,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNational Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC — $125,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTEACH ACTION FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSTATE ARMOR ACTION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetINVEST IN EDUCATION COALITION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN FREEDOM — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCoalition for American Excellence — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leon Rachel CorpAmerican Action Netwo…The Concord FundSumm Foundation
Leon Rachel CorpVA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leon Rachel Corp · American Action Network Inc · The Concord Fund · Summ Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ardleigh Impact Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ardleigh Impact Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Ardleigh Impact Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home