Skip to content
Leomi Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Leomi Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$555k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$1.1MPhilanthropy$955kArts & Culture$668kEducation$530kInternational$502kYouth Development$487kCivil Rights$431kCrime & Legal$391kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $505k
  • $250k+1 grant · $555k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENS FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INC$555,000
HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC$100,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC$100,000
VOW FOR GIRLS INC$100,000
SCHOOL FOR ETHICS AND GLOBAL LEADERSHIP$80,000
NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF RUPTURED & CRIP$75,000
V-DAY$50,000
MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC New World Schoo$25,000
DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS-BASED EDU$25,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$20,000
21ST CENTURY LEADERS INC$20,000
PROJECT DANDELION INC$20,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$15,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC$10,000
21ST CENTURY LEADERS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $226k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOW FOR GIRLS INC: $126k → 17%VOW FOR GIRLS INC: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Leomi Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Leomi Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 26 repeat orgs$922k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
37

Total granted

$4.5M
$722k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+49%

Still filing today

81%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $199k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthInternationalArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WOMEN'S FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $935k · revenue +259% · 40% of their budget
  • HI
    HEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $450k · revenue +363%
  • IF
    IAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $400k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SL
    SALT LAKE CITY FILM CENTER AND ARTISTS COLLABORATI
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • AC
    AFRICAN CEREMONIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +59%
  • TW
    THIRD WAVE VOLUNTEERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +589%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Washington and Affiliate

The mission of boys and girls clubs of greater washington is to help boys and girls of all backgrounds, especially those who need us most, build confidence, develop character and acquire the skills needed to become productive,…

—
3
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of America

The mission of the organization is to operate exclusively for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of, boys and girls clubs of america, a d.c. corporation that was congressionally chartered in 1956 ("boys & girls clubs of america")…

Youth Development
5
Boys and Girls Club of Generational Empowerment

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Health
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of King County

Youth health and social, educational, and character development of youth.

Recreation & Sports
7
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
8
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
9
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
10
Girl Effect Inc

Girl effect works for a future in which every girl is in control of her body, her health, her learning and her livelihood. we work across africa and asia with adolescent girls and young women using the power of media and technology to…

Youth Development
11
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater St Louis Inc

To inspire and enable youth ages 6 to 18 to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens. the boys and girls clubs of greater st. louis provides recreational, athletic and educational facilities for youth in…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vow for Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is American School of Madrid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
45/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN'S FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INC: $935,000 · OtherWOMEN'S FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INCHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $301,000 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INCSALT LAKE CITY FILM CENTER AND ARTISTS COLLABORATI: $150,000 · OtherSALT LAKE CITY FILM CENTER AND ARTISTS COLLABORA…VOW FOR GIRLS INC: $226,000 · OtherVOW FOR GIRLS INCDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $85,000 · OtherCASA VALENTINA INC: $135,000 · OtherCASA VALENTINA INCHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · Other+21 more: $450,225 · Other+21 moreHEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC: $450,000 · HealthHEALTH INFORMATION PROJE…IAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · HealthIAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NON…NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE: $75,000 · HealthNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE…+4 more: $65,000 · Health+4 moreTHE FOUNTAINHEAD RESIDENCY INC: $195,800 · Arts & CultureTHE FOUNT…SING FOR HOPE INC: $165,000 · Arts & CultureSING FOR …AFRICAN CEREMONIES INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN C…A BLADE OF GRASS FUND: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $20,000 · Arts & Culture21ST CENTURY LEADERS INC: $273,333 · Education21ST CENT…The School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $80,000 · EducationThe Schoo…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationGEORGETOW…NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $40,000 · EducationNEW WORLD…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $132,000 · InternationalAmerican School of Madrid: $100,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 · InternationalDKT INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · International+5 more: $41,750 · InternationalV-Day: $380,850 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $10,000 · Crime & LegalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF VALDOSTA INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs Northwest Georgia Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LANIER INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHARLAN COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BAY COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST GEORGIA INC: $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,392,225Health$1,190,000Arts & Culture$450,800Education$445,333International$393,750Crime & Legal$390,850Youth Development$301,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF MIAMI-DADE INC: $935,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetHEALTH INFORMATION PROJECT INC: $450,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetIAN'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetV-Day: $380,850 over 6y, 6.9% of budget21ST CENTURY LEADERS INC: $273,333 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetVOW FOR GIRLS INC: $226,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNTAINHEAD RESIDENCY INC: $195,800 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetSING FOR HOPE INC: $165,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCASA VALENTINA INC: $135,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $132,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican School of Madrid: $100,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $85,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $80,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION: $73,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE RIVER REGION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAFRICAN CEREMONIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER ISLAND PHILANTHROPIC FUND INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD WAVE VOLUNTEERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF VALDOSTA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs Northwest Georgia Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LANIER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARLAN COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BAY COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST GEORGIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetProject Dandelion Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetDKT INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA BLADE OF GRASS FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Inspire Brands Founda…The Miami Foundation …United Community Bank…Publix Super Markets …Good360The Shepard Broad Fou…United Way Miami IncGeorgia Power Foundat…The Batchelor Foundat…The Gap Foundation
Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return)GA32.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Inspire Brands Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · United Community Bank Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Good360 · The Shepard Broad Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leomi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leomi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Fountainhead Residency Inc: 3% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc: 0% of income from government
  • American Repertory Theatre Co Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leomi Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Leomi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leomi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home