Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lending Help For Students Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$447k
Granted FY2025still arriving
132
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.3MRecreation & Sports$363kArts & Culture$154kScience & Tech$38kHuman Services$35kCommunity Improvement$35kYouth Development$19kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 132 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k121 grants · $189k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $258k
$972
Median grant
20
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLG Cheer Sport The Cheer Pitt KC$47,591
Individual grant recipient$42,815
Kansas State University$35,690
Ed Financial Services$23,851
Pittsburg State University$22,957
University of Central Missouri$17,687
Missouri Valley College$17,569
Missouri State University$16,950
The Summit$12,379
Priscilla and Danas School of Dance$10,410
Individual grant recipient$10,295
Truman State University$9,883
Individual grant recipient$8,339
World Strides$7,166
University of Kansas$7,028
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA of Greater Kansas City: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 145 repeat orgs$745k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

145 repeat relationships: 69 still active in FY2025, 76 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

145
228

Total granted

$2.1M
$677k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+8%

Still filing today

13%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +44%
  • MV
    MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +22%
  • MN
    MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $173k
  • TC
    THE CHEER PITT KC SLG CHEER SPORT
    one grant, 2023 · $132k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $69k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
2
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
3
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
6
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
7
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
8
Upper Midwest Athletic Conference

The organization is organized exclusively for the fostering of amateur sports competition. the upper midwest athletic conference shall help member institutions promote and develop collegiate athletic programs and provide consistent…

Recreation & Sports
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is William Jewell College; the most unlike its peers is Heartland Figure Skating Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 437 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/44
Grantees still filing
23/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $193,806 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $173,478 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHEER PITT KC SLG CHEER SPORT: $132,097 · OtherSLG Cheer Sport The Cheer Pitt KC: $118,220 · OtherFORT OSAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $94,534 · OtherPittsburg State University: $92,844 · OtherKSTATE UNIVERSITY: $86,213 · OtherLending Help For Students Inc: $83,833 · Other+173 more: $1,515,105 · Other+173 moreLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $50,669 · EducationMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $35,454 · EducationMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $35,348 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $25,736 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $8,371 · EducationGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $7,384 · Education+6 more: $22,996 · EducationHOCKEY CLUB DES MOINES: $27,280 · Recreation & SportsKCFC: $6,209 · Recreation & SportsHEARTLAND FENCING ACADEMY INC: $3,863 · Recreation & SportsKANSAS CITY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATIO: $2,650 · Recreation & SportsLINE CREEK FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $1,987 · Recreation & SportsThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,925 · HealthYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $1,642 · Human Services
Other$2,490,130Education$185,958Recreation & Sports$41,989Health$2,925Human Services$1,642

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $50,669 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $35,454 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $35,348 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKEY CLUB DES MOINES: $27,280 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $25,736 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLESLEY UNIVERSITY: $10,076 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $8,371 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $8,333 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $7,384 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKCFC: $6,209 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetFriends University: $5,681 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $5,239 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Jewell College: $4,977 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FENCING ACADEMY INC: $3,863 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $2,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATIO: $2,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINE CREEK FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC: $1,987 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $1,929 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $1,642 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLENDING HOPE TO STUDENTS: $1,470 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MIDAMERICA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOCKEY CLUB DES MOINES ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO35.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Kansas Independent College Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Kansas City Football Coaches Association · Great Jobs Kc Inc · Servant Foundation · Greater Horizons · Jack J Isgur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lending Help For Students Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lending Help For Students Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Lesley University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lending Help For Students Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lending Help For Students Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 437 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lending Help For Students’ filings →

More from the funding graph