Skip to content

· Public charity

Lend A Helping Can Inc

LAHC was created to collect donations and distribute money to Not For Profit food banks and homeless shelters in New England.

$384k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$431kHuman Services$366kCommunity Improvement$287kFood & Nutrition$265kHealth$144kPublic Benefit$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $352k
$32,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$32,000
Families in Transition$32,000
Crossroads House$32,000
VT Food Bank$32,000
My Friends Place$32,000
NH Food Bank$32,000
Salvation Army$32,000
Community Partners$32,000
Davids House$32,000
Rockingham Community Action$32,000
Salvation Army$32,000
Got Lunch Ashland-Holderness$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Got Lunch Campton-Thornton$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%NH Food Bank: $33k → 7%NH Food Bank: $32k → 7%NH Food Bank: $32k → 7%NH Food Bank: $24k → 7%NH Food Bank: $23k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$1.7M
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-12%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Cross Roads House Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $144k · revenue +70%
  • DH
    DAVID'S HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $144k · revenue +230%
  • MF
    MY FRIEND'S PLACE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $144k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • GL
    GOT LUNCH LACONIA
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Joans Pantry

Joans Pantry provides free food to those in need in our community We receive food from USDA and the NH Food Bank and also purchase food to supplement what we get for free

Food & Nutrition
4
Feed Every Need

Feed Every Need is fighting hunger and food insecurity in Vermont by providing prepared meals to partner organizations for distribution to htose in need.

Food & Nutrition
5
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
6
Do You Know Him Ministries

Provide food clothing and comfort to the homeless in So NH

Human Services
7
Harvest House

Food Security

Human Services
8
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

—
9
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
10
New Hampshire Hunger Solutions Inc

We advocate to end food insecurity, improve equitable access to nutritious food, and address hunger's root causes for all new hampshire residents.

Civil Rights
11
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
12
Heart of Maine Resource Center

Heart of Maine Resource Center was founded in 2018 to bridge persistan gaps in access to food and supportive services for neighbors in the greater Dexter ME area. Transending the current community barrie

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Catholic Charities; the most unlike its peers is Got Lunch Campton-Thornton. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $287,440 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYRockingham Community Action: $143,720 · OtherRockingham Community ActionIndividual grant recipient: $143,720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCommunity Partners: $143,719 · OtherCommunity PartnersMY FRIEND'S PLACE: $143,719 · OtherMY FRIEND'S PLACECentral VT Salvation Army: $78,719 · OtherCentral VT Salvation ArmyNew Horizons for NH: $46,887 · Other+3 more: $64,374 · Other+3 moreCross Roads House Inc: $143,720 · Housing & ShelterCross Roads House …Families in Transition: $143,720 · Housing & ShelterFamilies in Transi…DAVID'S HOUSE INC: $143,719 · HealthDAVID'S H…New Hampshire Catholic Charities: $143,719 · Human ServicesNew Hamps…VERMONT FOODBANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionGOT LUNCH CAMPTON-THORNTON: $24,209 · Food & NutritionGOT LUNCH LACONIA: $8,250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,052,298Housing & Shelter$287,440Health$143,719Human Services$143,719Food & Nutrition$97,459

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCross Roads House Inc: $143,720 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFamilies in Transition: $143,720 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDAVID'S HOUSE INC: $143,719 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetMY FRIEND'S PLACE: $143,719 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $143,719 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Families in Transition ↗
  • Who funds DAVID'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MY FRIEND'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds GOT LUNCH CAMPTON-THORNTON ↗
  • Who funds GOT LUNCH LACONIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lend A Helping Can Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lend A Helping Can Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lend A Helping Can Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lend A Helping Can Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lend A Helping Can’s filings →

More from the funding graph