Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lench Charity Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$58kEducation$20kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$3kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$1kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHR SHMUEL$2,000
YESHIVA BE'ER HATALMUD$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
BETH JOSEPH$500
PEARL BLAU LEARNING INSTITUTE$250
HERITAGE HOUSE$200
Individual grant recipient$125
BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD$100
Individual grant recipient$50
TIKVA ODESSA$36
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $3k → 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $1k → 11%MISASKIM: $250 → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $500 → 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $200 → 11%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 59 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
56

Total granted

$115k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+21%

Still filing today

20%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +38%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • MA
    MAAYAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +13%
  • LA
    LEV ARYEH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
5
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
6
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
8
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
9
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
10
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
12
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud; the most unlike its peers is Nesivos Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $7,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA BER HATALMUD INC: $5,500 · OtherMISC 501 (C)(3): $4,988 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL SHAAREI SIMCHA: $4,700 · OtherTOMCHEI SHABBOS: $4,500 · OtherBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $4,000 · Other+91 more: $74,404 · Other+91 moreMAAYAN ACADEMY INC: $7,500 · EducationMAAYAN ACAD…YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $5,600 · EducationYESHIVA SHA…+8 more: $2,288 · Education+8 moreBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,350 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $250 · Human ServicesTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $4,000 · Food & NutritionNESIVOS INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentKEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC: $500 · ReligionBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $380 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $351 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $320 · ReligionDONORS FUND INC: $1,326 · Philanthropy
Other$118,842Education$15,388Human Services$5,600Food & Nutrition$4,000Youth Development$2,500Religion$1,551Philanthropy$1,326

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAAYAN ACADEMY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $5,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNESIVOS INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $1,326 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN ZICHRON YOSEF INC: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA RUACH HATORAH INC: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $351 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $280 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EVEN HABOCHEN INC: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAAYAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds NESIVOS INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY31.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Sorala Foundation · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donner Family Foundation · Jdh Foundation · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lench Charity Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lench Charity Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud: 6% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lench Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph