Skip to content

· Public charity

Legal Services Alabama Inc

Legal services alabama is a statewide nonprofit dedicated to providing access to justice and quality civil legal assistance to educate and empower alabama's low-income community.

$436k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$3.2M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $375k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM$75,000
SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM$75,000
ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM$75,000
LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE OF MADISON COUNTY$75,000
VOLUNTEER LAWYERS BIRMINGHAM$75,000
WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC$30,591
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$30,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $30k → 15%VOLUNTEER LAWYERS BIRMINGHAM: $75k → 16%ALABAMA DISABILITY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $69k → 17%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $75k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $75k → 19%WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $51k → 31%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRA: $70k → 16%ALABAMA DISABILITY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $39k → 17%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 19%WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $50k → 31%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 16%ALABAMA DISABILITY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $19k → 17%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 19%WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $31k → 31%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRA: $70k → 16%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 19%WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $21k → 31%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 16%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $70k → 19%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 16%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 19%BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 16%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $70k → 19%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VO: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $60k → 19%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VO: $70k → 18%SOUTH ALABAMA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $60k → 19%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $70k → 18%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $70k → 18%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $70k → 18%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $70k → 18%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $60k → 18%ALABAMA STATE BAR VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $60k → 18%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $75k → 18%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $60k → 18%MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION VOLUNTEER LAWYER PROGRAM: $45k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 7 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$3.2M
$30k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MADISON COUNTY VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $615k · revenue +37% · 36% of their budget
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $600k · revenue +6% · 32% of their budget
  • BV
    BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $495k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2025 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

South Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program: $615,000 · Crime & LegalSouth Alabama Volunteer Lawyers ProgramMADISON COUNTY VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $615,000 · Crime & LegalMADISON COUNTY VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAMMONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Crime & LegalMONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATIONBIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC: $495,000 · Crime & LegalBIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INCAlabama Dept Conservation & Natural Res: $615,000 · OtherAlabama Dept Conservation & Natu…WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVEL CO: $152,780 · OtherWEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVEL…BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $126,607 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABA…+1 more: $30,350 · Other
Crime & Legal$2,325,000Other$924,737

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouth Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program: $615,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetMADISON COUNTY VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM: $615,000 over 9y, 36% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 9y, 32% of budgetBIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC: $495,000 over 7y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds South Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COUNTY VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST MID ALABAMA COMMUNITY DEVEL CO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Law Foundation IncAL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Law Foundation Inc · Alabama Civil Justice Foundation · Birmingham Volunteer Lawyers Program Inc · South Alabama Volunteer Lawyers Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legal Services Alabama Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legal Services Alabama Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Legal Services Alabama’s filings →

    More from the funding graph