Skip to content

· Private foundation

Legacies Foundation Management

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$199kInternational$20kReligion$15kHealth$2kEducation$1k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,721
Median grant
1
States reached
$667k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES$20,721
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAN-MASS CHALLENGE: $282 → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA: $100 → 17%RCCS: $1k → 20%CONGERGATION JUDEA: $2k → 13%VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $150 → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $45k → 7%BIKE 4 CHAI: $500 → 11%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $15k → 17%FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $360 → 20%VARIOUS CHARITIES - SEE ATTACHED: $35k → 7%EMUNAH OF AMERICA: $5k → 17%VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES - SEE ATTACHED: $33k → 7%AMIT CHILDREN: $360 → 17%VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES: $28k → 7%SHIR HADASH: $1k → 17%VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES: $25k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITAL: $180 → 17%CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $6k → 7%VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES: $21k → 7%PROJECT EZRAH: $100 → 7%VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES: $12k → 7%ENGLEWOOD MIKVAH ASSOCIATION: $32 → 7%SINAI SCHOOLS: $650 → 7%YACHAD: $200 → 7%CONG BNAI YESHURUN: $100 → 7%CONGREGATION DARCHEI NOAM: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS MISC CHARITIES: $84,704 · OtherVARIOUS MISC CHARITIESCONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH: $6,300 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAHCONGREGATION DARCHEI NOAM INC: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $6,174 · Other+12 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $15,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Is…EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 · InternationalEMUNAH OF AMERICA …+2 more: $540 · InternationalProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$102,178International$20,040Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $282 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENGLEWOOD MIKVAH ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Legacies Foundation Management funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Legacies Foundation Management. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $35k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Legacies Foundation Management’s filings →

More from the funding graph