Skip to content

· Private foundation

Leemoy Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$176kReligion$107kHealth$101kScience & Tech$10kArts & Culture$7kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD VISION$17,000
PAZ NAZ CHURCH$12,800
ALABASTER INTERNATIONAL$5,000
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$5,000
US UKRAINE FOUNDATION$3,000
LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE$3,000
OMF INTERNATIONAL INC$2,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$2,000
DAVID AND MARY CHOW FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABILITY FIRST: $8k → 14%ABILITY FIRST: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$252k · 14 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$252k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    8× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +51%
  • CR
    CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +41%
  • AI
    ALABASTER INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AM
    ALABASTER MOBILE CLINIC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TW
    THE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
Rusi (Us) Foundation
Philanthropy
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
Ukraine War Relief Fund
International
7
World Health Foundation
—
8
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
9
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
10
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
11
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
12
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is David and Mary Chow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC: $136,800 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCCREATE AN IMPACT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $14,000 · InternationalCREATE AN IMPACT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+1 more: $4,200 · InternationalCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $26,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INCALABASTER INTERNATIONAL: $19,000 · HealthALABASTER INTERNATIONALTHE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 · HealthTHE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITU…LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 · HealthLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $70,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWS…PAZ NAZ CHURCH: $29,150 · OtherPAZ NAZ CHURCHASIAN AMERICAN PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN…VISION CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $4,000 · OtherVISION CHRISTI…FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE OF PAS: $2,700 · OtherFIRST CHURCH O…ALABASTER MOBILE CLINIC: $2,600 · OtherOMF INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS: $2,000 · OtherTHE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA: $2,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherABILITYFIRST: $13,000 · Human ServicesDavid and Mary Chow Foundation: $3,000 · EducationHOUSE OF UKRAINE: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
International$155,000Health$115,000Religion$70,000Other$50,450Human Services$13,000Education$3,000Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $136,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALABASTER INTERNATIONAL: $19,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCREATE AN IMPACT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $4,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDavid and Mary Chow Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetTHE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF UKRAINE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABASTER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CREATE AN IMPACT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
  • Who funds THE BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds David and Mary Chow Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF UKRAINE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leemoy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leemoy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leemoy Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leemoy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leemoy Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph