· Public charity
Leeds Foundation Pbc Inc
The leeds endowment, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $233,753 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $296,511 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,758 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIVEHEART DBA THRESHER AQUA | $90,000 |
| SHIFTING GEARS UNITED INC | $40,000 |
| THE O2 PROJECT INC | $32,000 |
| CLINICS CAN HELP | $26,753 |
| TIDAL K9 TRAINING LLC | $25,000 |
| Sea Turtle Adventures | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCLINICS CAN HELP INC6× · 2019–2024 · $255k · revenue +41%
- SGSHIFTING GEARS UNITED INC5× · 2020–2024 · $138k · revenue +36% · 38% of their budget
- AIAchilles International Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- CFCAMO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $20k
- TKTIDAL K9 DOG TRAINING CENTERone grant, 2021 · $13k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Raising and training service dogs for disabled military vets.
To educate and empower individuals with special needs in life-changing sport and recreation
Helping paws, inc. furthers people's independence and quality of life through the use of assistance dogs.
Organization committed to raising the awareness of pet with disabilities and assisting in the adoption and care of disabled pets.
Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.
To provide independence and improve the quality of life for combat wounded veterans, first responders and children by creating life changing partnerships with highly skilled assistance dogs.
To provide a sanctuary for senior pets (dogs, cats, farm animals) and to provide access to vet care for indigent people
The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…
To support, through financial grants, individuals with disabilities who require assistance to pursue an active lifestyle.
To provide service dogs to the disabled and military veterans suffering from ptsd
Identify recipients for service dogs, match them with dogs suitable for them through professional dog trainers, and fund training for the dog/hero team with professional dog trainers.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Student Aces Inc and the most unlike its peers is G4 Good Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Diveheart Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLINICS CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds SHIFTING GEARS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SEA TURTLE ADVENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds Furry Friends Humane Inc ↗
- Who funds G4 GOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Palm Beach Post Season to Share Inc ↗
- Who funds Student Aces Inc ↗
- Who funds PAWSITIVE ACTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leeds Foundation Pbc Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leeds Foundation Pbc Inc?
Find your warmest path to Leeds Foundation Pbc Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.