Skip to content

New York · Public charity

Leebling Inc

The organization was formed for the purpose of helping out the people in our community and operating a day care center.

$92k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
33%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$52k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$6,995
Largest grant, FY2024
$16,393
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$4.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 33% of the organizations Leebling Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 28% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$52k60%
FY20233$43k33%
FY20222$14k50%
FY20212$12k100%
FY20192$17kn/a
71% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$80kYouth Development$26kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United Talmudical Academy of Boro Park$32,1474n/a
Hisachdis Hatalmidim Dkeren Shmiel$28,3932n/a
Yeoded Inc$26,40021%
Congregation Bais Shmiel Tzvi$15,6282n/a
Cong Khal Torath Chaim Viznitz of Bp$8,9281n/a
Congregation Shearis Menachem Dvisheve$8,4551n/a
Talmud Torah Ohel Yochanan$6,7652n/a
Congregation Bais Mordechai Inc$6,4511n/a
Yeshiva Machzikei Hadas$5,7801n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY23.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Leebling Inc with peer funders

About Leebling Inc

How much does Leebling Inc give?
Leebling Inc reported 5 itemized grants totaling $52,232, out of $92,129 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Leebling Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (58%), Youth Development (19%).
Who are Leebling Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: United Talmudical Academy of Boro Park ($32k), Hisachdis Hatalmidim Dkeren Shmiel ($28k), Yeoded Inc ($26k).
Does Leebling Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Leebling Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Ojc Fund, American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Leebling Inc based?
Leebling Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $106k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leebling’s filings →

More from the funding graph