Skip to content
Leaves of Grass Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Leaves of Grass Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
132
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.1MFood & Nutrition$1.9MInternational$1.7MEnvironment$1.7MCivil Rights$1.1MEducation$845kHuman Services$748kPublic Benefit$734kOther$0
02FY2024 · 132 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k82 grants · $313k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $715k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $580k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$150,000
CEDARS SINAI HOSPITAL$100,000
FAIR ELECTION CENTER$60,000
ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL$60,000
ACLU NATIONAL$60,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL DR MELISSA FREY RESEARCH$50,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$50,000
MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$35,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$30,000
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
FOODBANK FOR NYC$30,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$26,000
PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS$25,000
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL FAMILY VAN$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $612k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREEDOM OF THE PRESS FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $15k → 12%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $10k → 12%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $25k → 7%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $15k → 12%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $20k → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $8k → 17%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $5k → 12%REFUGEE DREAM CENTER: $5k → 14%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $12k → 7%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $6k → 8%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $12k → 7%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $5k → 8%NatioNAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK: $4k → 12%REFUGEE DREAM CENTER: $5k → 14%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $12k → 7%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $4k → 8%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $8k → 7%KIDS CLOTHES CLUB: $4k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $15k → 7%SPRINGWELL: $76k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $6k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $6k → 7%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 7%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $30k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $25k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $25k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $15k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $5k → 16%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 16%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $10k → 14%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $26k → 17%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $5k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $12k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $12k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $11k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%CHARITY GLOBAL: $10k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $8k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $7k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $6k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITYWATER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 200 repeat orgs$858k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

200 repeat relationships: 109 still active in FY2024, 91 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

200
55

Total granted

$12M
$623k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+23%

Still filing today

70%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +81%
  • MA
    MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $409k · revenue +33%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $346k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • PA
    PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD UNIV
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SI
    SPRINGWELL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $76k · revenue +190%
  • ST
    SPREAD THE VOTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
7
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
12
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action; the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 195 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
194/195
Grantees still filing
132/195
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $650,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDHARVARD COLLEGE: $400,000 · OtherCEDARS SINAI HOSPITAL: $400,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $328,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $302,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $345,500 · OtherBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $301,000 · Other+114 more: $4,828,250 · Other+114 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,308,000 · InternationalInternational Re…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $112,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL ME…WATERAID AMERICA INC: $89,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $73,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $70,000 · International+10 more: $252,250 · International+10 moreCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $143,500 · EnvironmentCONSERVAT…EARTHJUSTICE: $133,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUST…WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $115,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEP…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $92,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CON…RIVERKEEPER INC: $91,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEP…Coastal Mountains Land Trust: $74,000 · EnvironmentCoastal M…RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $57,000 · EnvironmentRAINFORES…Environmental Law Institute: $45,000 · EnvironmentAMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $37,000 · Environment+14 more: $265,000 · Environment+14 moreGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $141,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $129,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CLOTHES CLUB INC: $97,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGWELL INC: $75,533 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $57,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $26,000 · Human Services+3 more: $46,500 · Human ServicesMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $409,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $155,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $48,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPART OF THE SOLUTION: $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $49,000 · Food & NutritionFair Elections Center: $255,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $108,000 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $52,500 · Civil RightsROCK THE VOTE: $41,500 · Civil RightsSPREAD THE VOTE INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsPrison Policy Initiative: $36,000 · Civil RightsFreedom for Immigrants: $34,000 · Civil RightsUS VOTE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsHEAD COUNT INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsNonprofit VOTE Inc: $24,500 · Civil Rights+2 more: $22,000 · Civil RightsBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $80,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationCROSS' MILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $15,000 · Education+2 more: $22,000 · Education
Other$7,555,250International$1,904,750Environment$1,053,000Human Services$724,533Food & Nutrition$716,000Civil Rights$668,500Education$412,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,308,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $409,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $345,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $328,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $301,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFair Elections Center: $255,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $155,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION INC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $143,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $141,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $133,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $129,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVIOLENCE POLICY CENTER: $115,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $115,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $112,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $108,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS CLOTHES CLUB INC: $97,000 over 8y, 60% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $92,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $92,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $91,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL: $90,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $89,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC: $84,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGWELL INC: $75,533 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCoastal Mountains Land Trust: $74,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $73,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOETS IN NEED: $72,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS INC: $67,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS WORKSHOP INC DBA NEW ENGLAND CENTER AND HOME FOR VETERANS: $67,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $61,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $61,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $59,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMake the Road New York: $57,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $57,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $52,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCARBON CYCLE INSTITUTE: $51,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetEarthworks: $51,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CLOTHES CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncThe New York Communit…Rsf Social Finance IncSilicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationWellspring Philanthro…Give Lively Foundatio…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Ford FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…New Venture FundMarty and Dorothy Sil…
Boston Foundation IncMA26.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · New Venture Fund · Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leaves of Grass Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leaves of Grass Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Springwell Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans: 66% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Margarita Muniz Academy Foundation Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Community Music Center of Boston Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leaves of Grass Fund?

Find your warmest path to Leaves of Grass Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 279 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leaves of Grass’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home