How much did LE VISTA DI RAVELLO FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of LE VISTA DI RAVELLO FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$483k

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDRENS PERFORMING ARTS$5,000
THE ANDREW MCMORRIS FDN$4,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LONG ISLAND$3,200
HUNTINGTON YMCA$3,000
RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLAY$2,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$1,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
ELIJAH ALAVI FOUNDATION$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW YORK$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
MARCH OF DIMES$1,000
MAKE A WISH$1,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
ONE BLUE VILLAGE$1,000
LONG ISLAND CARES INC$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$79k · 17 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$79k

$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%

+17%

Still filing today

47%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HH
HELPING HAND RESCUE MISSION
4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +40%
TA
THE ANDREW MCMORRIS FOUNDATION
3× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +179%
EA
ELIJAH ALAVI FOUNDATION
3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +66%

Funded once

CC
COHEN CHILDRENS MED CTENTER
one grant, 2023 · $1k
TP
THE PHIL AND AMY MICKELSON FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $1k
NC
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM
one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Montefiore Health System Inc

To heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve.

Health

Long Island Jewish Medical Center

LIJMC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Maimonides Medical Center

Maimonides medical center is dedicated to fostering healthy communities. we provide high quality, compassionate patient care and comprehensive community services. as a premier academic medical center, we are devoted to educating health…

Health

Nyu Langone Hospitals

Nyu langone hospitals' trifold mission to serve, teach, and discover is achieved daily through an integrated academic culture devoted to excellence in patient care, education, and research.

Health

White Plains Hospital Medical Center

To offer high quality, acute health care and preventive medical care to all people who live in, work in, or visit westchester county and its surrounding areas.

Health

Northwell Health Inc

Northwell Health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement

New York Medical College

Educate physicians, scientists, public health specialists & other healthcare professionals.

—

Long Island University

Provide excellence and access in education to those who seek to expand their knowledge. see sch o.

—

Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Nwh strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Phelps Memorial Hospital Association

Pmha strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Health

The Myositis Association

In 2023, The Myositis Association (TMA) celebrated our 30th year of service to the worldwide myositis community. TMA Myositis Africa was established as our newest regional support group, with support from the TMA Women of Color Affinity…

Human Services

Plainview Hospital

health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

7/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$67,200International$12,500Education$7,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$3,500Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LE VISTA DI RAVELLO FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE ANDREW MCMORRIS FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 834023798 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE ANDREW MCMORRIS FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Le Vista Di Ravello Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Le Vista Di Ravello Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LE VISTA DI RAVELLO FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Le Vista Di Ravello Foundation?

More from the funding graph

LE VISTA DI RAVELLO FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Le Vista Di Ravello Foundation?

More from the funding graph