Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lde Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$81kFood & Nutrition$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kYouth Development$12kHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ben's Lighthouse$4,000
Southbury Food Bank$3,500
DMAX Foundation$3,500
Wellmore Behavioral Health$1,500
Safe Haven of Greater Waterbury Inc$1,500
Community Kitchen of Torrington$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Ben's Lighthouse: $4k → 9%Ben's Lighthouse: $4k → 9%Ben's Lighthouse: $4k → 9%Community Kitchen of Torrington: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 16 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$126k
$13k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +835%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +33%
  • NS
    NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +283%

Funded once

  • NM
    National MS Society
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • DW
    Dylan's Wings of Change
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • AR
    American Red Cross CT Regional Chapter
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visionsservices for the Blind and Visually Impaired

Visions is a 98-year-old nonprofit vision rehabilitation and social service organization that trains low income people of all ages experiencing blindness and severe vision loss to lead independent and active lives at work, in their homes…

Human Services
2
Women's Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh

The mission of women's center & shelter of greater pittsburgh is to strengthen our ability to meet the individual and evolving needs of those affected by domestic violence by investing in the growth of our people, deepening community…

Human Services
3
Family Health Initiatives Inc

Our mission is to help hospitals, nonprofits and government improve the health and well being of communities.

Health
4
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
5
Berkshire Medical Center Inc

The mission of berkshire medical center is to advance health and wellness for everyone in our community in a welcoming, inclusive, and personalized environment.

Health
6
Greenwich Hospital

To provide healthcare services.

Health
7
Helen Keller International

Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…

International
8
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
9
Utah Partners for Health

Utah partners for health provides compassionate, comprehensive, quality care to empower underserved individuals, families, and communities in a patient-centered medical home.

Health
10
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

—
11
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
12
Tidalhealth Nanticoke Inc

Improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Society to Prevent Blindness; the most unlike its peers is Friendly Hands Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Red Cross CT and RI Region: $14,500 · OtherAmerican Red Cross CT and RI RegionNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $10,500 · OtherNational Kidney Foundation IncAmerican Cancer Society New England Division: $8,750 · OtherAmerican Cancer Society New England DivisionAlzheimers Association CT Chapter: $7,500 · OtherAlzheimers Association CT ChapterSouthbury Food Bank: $7,250 · OtherSouthbury Food BankAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC: $7,000 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INCNational MS Society: $3,500 · OtherDylan's Wings of Change: $3,500 · OtherAmerican Lung Association of Connecticut: $3,500 · OtherAmerican Red Cross CT Regional Chapter: $2,750 · OtherHEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE: $2,500 · Other+2 more: $3,000 · OtherMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association I…DMAX FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthDMAX FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $3,750 · HealthNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT …WELLMORE INC: $3,376 · HealthWELLMORE INCBENS LIGHTHOUSE INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesBENS LIGHTHO…SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $3,376 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN O…COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF TORRINGTON INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY KI…FRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDLY HA…
Other$74,250Health$35,126Human Services$15,876Food & Nutrition$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetBENS LIGHTHOUSE INC: $11,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDMAX FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWELLMORE INC: $3,376 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC: $3,376 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BENS LIGHTHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds DMAX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds WELLMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF TORRINGTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lde Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lde Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 65%
  • Wellmore Inc: 65% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lde’s filings →

More from the funding graph