Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lchayim Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$330kEducation$32kHuman Services$16kYouth Development$9kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$1kPublic Benefit$1kFood & Nutrition$480Other$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k55 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAIS YAKOV D'RAV MEIR$13,600
SHIRAS BAIS YAAKOV$10,180
BAIS BINYOMIN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,480
CONGREGATION ZICHRON MENACHEM$7,500
THE DONORS FUND$6,250
TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD$5,000
AGUDAS YISROEL$5,000
LEV BAIS YAAKOV$5,000
CHABAD OF BAL HARBOR$5,000
YESHIVA OHR YISRAEL$5,000
BAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY$5,000
NACHLAS LEVI YITZCHOK$4,250
YESHIVA TORAH VODAATH$3,700
PROSPECT PARK YESHIVA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ACHIEZER: $180 → 14%AHAVAS TZEDAKOS: $300 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDAKOS: $180 → 11%SHIDDUCH CENTRAL INC: $72 → 14%OORAH: $100 → 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH: $150 → 20%KEREN KATZEDAKA: $10 → 11%TEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH: $100 → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $5 → 11%OZER DALIM OF LAKEWOOD: $5 → 11%A TIME: $180 → 20%A TIME: $180 → 20%A TIME: $108 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%ASHREINU: $15 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $180 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $180 → 20%BOBBIES PLACE: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 59 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
110

Total granted

$259k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-7%

Still filing today

31%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SHIRAS RUCHAMA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +35%
  • AO
    ALWAYS OUR KIDS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • BJ
    BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • ZM
    ZICHRON MENACHEM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
8
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
11
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
12
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cong Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eileen and Murray Friedman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 197 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
21/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAIS YAKOV D'RAV MEIR: $43,100 · OtherBAIS YAKOV D'RAV MEIRCONG DIVRI EMUNA INC: $27,370 · OtherCONG DIVRI EMUNA INCCHABAD OF MARINE PARK INC: $25,372 · OtherCHABAD OF MARINE PARK INCAGUDAS YISROEL: $20,922 · OtherAGUDAS YISROELTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $15,000 · OtherNACHLAS YITZCHOK: $13,097 · Other+161 more: $211,412 · Other+161 moreSHIRAS RUCHAMA INC: $15,930 · EducationSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $3,000 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationALWAYS OUR KIDS INC: $8,540 · Youth DevelopmentDONORS FUND INC: $6,250 · PhilanthropyEILEEN AND MURRAY FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION: $453 · Philanthropy+2 more: $41 · PhilanthropyBOBBIES PLACE INC: $540 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $480 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $468 · Human ServicesTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $250 · Human ServicesOORAH INC: $200 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $180 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $100 · Human Services+3 more: $107 · Human ServicesYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $360 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $250 · ReligionCHAYIM V CHESED: $150 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $105 · ReligionYESHIVA GIVING FUND INC: $100 · ReligionI MAASER INC: $87 · ReligionBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $72 · ReligionMIKVAH USA INC: $59 · Religion+2 more: $20 · ReligionVYAZREIM INC: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$356,273Education$19,530Youth Development$8,540Philanthropy$6,744Human Services$2,325Religion$1,203Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHIRAS RUCHAMA INC: $15,930 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALWAYS OUR KIDS INC: $8,540 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL INC: $7,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOBBIES PLACE INC: $540 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BRACHA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $468 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEILEEN AND MURRAY FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION: $453 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YITZCHOK: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEN YAD KALLAH GEMACH INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $222 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $196 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILING SOULS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GIVING FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI MAASER INC: $87 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYL HEARTS Inc: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIDDUCH CENTRAL INC: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $59 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJust One Chesed Inc: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $20 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAshreinu Inc: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG CHASDEI YISROEL INC: $15 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCongregation Rav Lehoshia Inc: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHIRAS RUCHAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ALWAYS OUR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY67.8× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Jsw Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lchayim Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lchayim Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bnos Bracha Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 197 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lchayim’s filings →

More from the funding graph