Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawyers Helping Hungry Children

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Food & Nutrition$238kHuman Services$47kHealth$22kInternational$5kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TILLICUM COMMUNITY CENTER$42,473
EATONVILLE FOOD PANTRY$32,715
KING COUNTY EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGR$2,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$2,000
SEATTLE SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM$2,000
CARE FOOD PANTRY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOOD BACKPACKS 4KIDS: $22k → 9%FOOD BACKPACKS 4KIDS: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 5 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$120k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+230%

Still filing today

60%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $42k · revenue +461%
  • NH
    NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
    5× · 2017–2022 · $27k · revenue +1%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • EC
    ELOISES COOKING POT FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • NT
    NORTHEAST TACOMA HEALTHY KIDS COALITION
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • BB
    BASH Bikers Against Statewide Hungergraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +230%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TILLICUM COMMUNITY CENTER: $42,473 · OtherTILLICUM COMMUNITY CENTEREATONVILLE FOOD PANTRY: $32,715 · OtherEATONVILLE FOOD PANTRYNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $27,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMEMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM: $26,000 · OtherEMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAMELOISES COOKING POT FOOD BANK: $23,340 · OtherELOISES COOKING POT FOOD BANKNORTHEAST TACOMA HEALTHY KIDS COALITION: $21,500 · OtherNORTHEAST TACOMA HEALTHY KIDS COALITIONCITY OF SEATTLE SUMMER FEEDING PROGRAM: $20,000 · OtherCITY OF SEATTLE SUMMER FEEDING PROGRAM+6 more: $21,000 · Other+6 moreFOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $41,500 · Human ServicesFOOD BACKPACKS…BASH Bikers Against Statewide Hunger: $20,000 · Food & NutritionBASH Bikers A…GoodRoots Northwest: $18,000 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots Nor…MY SISTERS PANTRY: $18,000 · ReligionCARES OF WASHINGTON: $5,000 · EmploymentCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 · International
Other$214,028Human Services$41,500Food & Nutrition$38,000Religion$18,000Employment$5,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS: $41,500 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBASH Bikers Against Statewide Hunger: $20,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest: $18,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCARES OF WASHINGTON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BACKPACKS 4 KIDS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds BASH Bikers Against Statewide Hunger ↗
  • Who funds GoodRoots Northwest ↗
  • Who funds MY SISTERS PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds CARES OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emergency Food Network of Tacoma and Pierce CountyWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emergency Food Network of Tacoma and Pierce County · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawyers Helping Hungry Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawyers Helping Hungry Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lawyers Helping Hungry Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph