Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawrence M & Kerin C Magdovitz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$745kPhilanthropy$183kYouth Development$122kEmployment$81kHealth$21kCrime & Legal$20kReligion$19kPublic Benefit$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX CHAPEL AME CHURCH$7,040
MEMPHIS INNER CITY RUGBY$6,000
WEST TENNESSEE STATE GUARD ASSOC$5,000
WHITE STATION HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
LAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CASALUZ: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$756k · 13 repeat orgs$487k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$756k
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+6%

Still filing today

31%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2024 · $508k · revenue +40%
  • MF
    MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +7%
  • TW
    TENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $124k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • SJ
    SOUTHERN JEWISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATIO
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
2
Memphis Academy of Science and Engineeri

To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community

Education
3
LeTourneau University

Letourneau university is a comprehensive institution of christian higher education where educators engage learners to nurture christian virtue, to develop competency and ingenuity in their professional fields, to integrate faith and work,…

Education
4
One Family Memphis
Human Services
5
Southern Research Institute

To offer research and technology services to support the life sciences, energy, and environmental protection industries. the organization pursues entrepreneurial and collaborative initiatives to develop and maintain a pipeline of…

Science & Tech
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Bloodwater Mission Inc

Bloodwater mission, inc. (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization registered in nashville, tennessee that operates an international nonprofit that partners with african community-driven organizations to end water and hiv/aids…

Religion
8
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
9
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
10
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
11
Mayor's Institute for Excellence in Government Inc

Develop and implement programs to meet major urban challenges that exist for memphis, tennessee

Public Benefit
12
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Clarksdale Revitalization Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $124,000 · OtherSHELBY COUNTY SCHOOLSTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYSOUTHERN JEWISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATIO: $100,000 · OtherSOUTHERN JEWISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATIOMS COUNCIL FOR FARM WORKER OPPORTUN: $81,000 · OtherMS COUNCIL FOR FARM WORKER OPPORTUNBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $41,352 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBWREG: $40,763 · OtherWREG+18 more: $108,052 · Other+18 moreLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $508,498 · EducationLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL+2 more: $11,000 · EducationMemphis Inner City Rugby: $80,130 · Youth DevelopmentCASALUZ: $20,000 · Human ServicesB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $12,500 · HealthMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $8,234 · Food & NutritionTENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · AnimalsPIONEER MISSIONS GLOBAL: $2,000 · Religion
Other$595,167Education$519,498Youth Development$80,130Human Services$20,000Health$12,500Food & Nutrition$8,234Animals$5,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $508,498 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMemphis Inner City Rugby: $80,130 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetCASALUZ: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOBAKI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $8,234 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClarksdale Revitalization Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPIONEER MISSIONS GLOBAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUSANNE COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Inner City Rugby ↗
  • Who funds CASALUZ ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) ↗
  • Who funds LOBAKI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Clarksdale Revitalization Inc ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER MISSIONS GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds SPRING INITIATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence M & Kerin C Magdovitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence M & Kerin C Magdovitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence M & Kerin C Magdovitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph