Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lawrence E White Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$828k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$2.7MRecreation & Sports$291kAnimals$27kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$8kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $149k
  • $250k+2 grants · $630k
$148,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$335,000
Lake Highland Prep School$294,943
AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$148,500
LEHIGH VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB$45,000
Winter Park Playhouse$3,000
Center For Wildlife Studies$1,280
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $335k → 11%Crossroads Corral: $3k → 11%Lake Highland Prep School: $295k → 13%Center For Wildlife Studies: $2k → 11%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $157k → 11%Crossroads Corral: $500 → 11%Lake Highland Prep School: $255k → 13%Center For Wildlife Studies: $1k → 11%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $157k → 11%Lake Highland Prep School: $42k → 13%Center For Wildlife Studies: $1k → 11%LEHIGH UNIVERISTY: $157k → 11%Lake Highland Prep School: $28k → 13%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $157k → 11%LAKE HIGHLAND PREP SCHOOL: $26k → 13%AOK SCHOLARS: $858k → 13%AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $624k → 13%AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $345k → 13%AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $161k → 13%AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $149k → 13%AMERICAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA WRESTING ACADEMY: $6k → 13%ROLLINS COLLEGE: $12k → 13%Winter Park Playhouse: $3k → 13%Winter Park Playhouse: $3k → 13%THE WINTER PARK PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 13%THE WINTER PARK PLAYHOUSE: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$3.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+15%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $806k · revenue +18%
  • LV
    LEHIGH VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB
    5× · 2021–2025 · $285k · revenue +58%
  • CF
    Central Florida Zoological Society Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $22k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $858k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $157k
  • RC
    ROLLINS COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
4
Air Force Regional Training Center

The U.S. Air Force Academy has three core values: Integrity first, service before self, and excellence in all we do. The Air Force Regional Training Center (AFRTC) is the extension of that platform providing an elite wrestling program to…

Recreation & Sports
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
8
Texas Collegiate Wrestling Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Lindenwood Education System

Real experience. real success.enhancing lives through quality education and professional preparatory experiences. see schedule o.values:we put our students first. we have an unwavering commitment to providing the highest quality education,…

Education
10
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Wildlife Studies and the most unlike its peers is American Dreams Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $1,278,506 · OtherAOK SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $857,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLake Highland Prep School — $647,048 · OtherLake Highland Prep SchoolIndividual grant recipient — $157,000 · Other+2 more — $6,220 · OtherLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $806,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY+1 more — $11,660 · EducationLEHIGH VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB — $285,000 · Recreation & SportsCentral Florida Zoological Society Inc — $22,485 · AnimalsCENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES — $4,166 · AnimalsAMERICAN DREAMS FOUNDATION — $10,125 · PhilanthropyTHE WINTER PARK PLAYHOUSE INC — $8,080 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS CORRAL INC — $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,946,274Education$817,660Recreation & Sports$285,000Animals$26,651Philanthropy$10,125Arts & Culture$8,080Youth Development$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $806,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB — $285,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCentral Florida Zoological Society Inc — $22,485 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE — $11,660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINTER PARK PLAYHOUSE INC — $8,080 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES — $4,166 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS CORRAL INC — $3,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LEHIGH VALLEY ATHLETIC CLUB
  • Who funds Central Florida Zoological Society Inc
  • Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE
  • Who funds AMERICAN DREAMS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE WINTER PARK PLAYHOUSE INC
  • Who funds Central Florida Wrestling Academy Inc
  • Who funds CENTER FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES
  • Who funds CROSSROADS CORRAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lawrence E White Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rollins College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph