Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2022
19
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$182kPhilanthropy$17kInternational$14kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$10kScience & Tech$5kArts & Culture$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAT'L MS SOCIETY$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER$5,000
TISCH MS RESEARCH CTR OF NY$5,000
ST JUDE CHIDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$2,500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
ALZEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,000
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOC$2,000
ISLAND HARVEST$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSN$2,000
MARCH OF DIMES$2,000
VARIOUS CHARITIES$1,000
HIAS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%LONG ISLAND CARES: $2k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%ISLAND HARVEST: $2k → 6%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $3k → 17%ISLAND HARVEST: $500 → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$233k · 21 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$233k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+44%

Still filing today

62%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +145%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $16k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • MS
    MS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • LI
    Long Island Cares Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
Mount Sinai Community Foundation

To improve the health of the community it serves by ensuring the availability of medical, surgical, and primary care physicians and advanced practice providers and high quality healthcare services.

—
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
11
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
12
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER: $55,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCERAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS: $8,600 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherMS SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherNAT'L MS SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherTISCH MS RESEARCH CTR OF NY: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $19,650 · Other+12 moreST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $50,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITALST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,750 · Health+4 more: $4,200 · HealthOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,500 · InternationalOPERATION …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $6,000 · InternationalAMERICAN F…HIAS INC: $5,500 · InternationalHIAS INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,750 · InternationalUNITED STA…+1 more: $500 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $16,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD: $3,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$130,000Health$83,450International$24,250Philanthropy$16,000Human Services$12,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Recreation & Sports$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan’s filings →

More from the funding graph