How much did LAWRENCE AND MARILYN KAPLAN FOUNDATION grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of LAWRENCE AND MARILYN KAPLAN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

03FY2022 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$619k

Total assets

Largest grants

SHRINERS HOSP CHILDREN$5,000
NAT'L MS SOCIETY$5,000
ST JUDE CHIDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER$5,000
TISCH MS RESEARCH CTR OF NY$5,000
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSN$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOC$2,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
ISLAND HARVEST$2,000
MARCH OF DIMES$2,000
ALZEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,000
UJA FEDERATION$1,000
VARIOUS CHARITIES$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 47% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$233k · 21 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$233k

$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+44%

Still filing today

38%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SF
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +37%
OS
OPERATION SMILE
4× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +37%
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
2× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +206%

Funded once

MS
MS SOCIETY
one grant, 2018 · $5k
IF
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP
one grant, 2018 · $2k
LI
LONG ISLAND CARESgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +181%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Montefiore Health System Inc

To heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve.

Health

Mount Sinai Medical Center

Mt. sinai medical center insurance trust is a self-insurance trust that has been set up to cover malpractice and general liability claims filed against mt. sinai medical center of florida, inc.

Membership Benefit

Nyu Langone Hospitals

Nyu langone hospitals' trifold mission to serve, teach, and discover is achieved daily through an integrated academic culture devoted to excellence in patient care, education, and research.

Health

Mount Sinai Hospital Medical Center

As a member of sinai health system, mount sinai hospital medical center's mission is to improve the health of the individuals and communities it serves by providing comprehensive medical, surgical, pediatric, psychiatric, and intensive…

Health

New York Medical College

Educate physicians, scientists, public health specialists & other healthcare professionals.

—

Mcr Health Inc

To provide medical, dental and mental health care services to all individuals including the uninsured in Florida . See Schedule O.Our mission is to provide all patients, including the underserved and uninsured, access to quality primary…

—

Maimonides Medical Center

Maimonides medical center is dedicated to fostering healthy communities. we provide high quality, compassionate patient care and comprehensive community services. as a premier academic medical center, we are devoted to educating health…

Health

The Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation

Health grant maker and supporting organization to the jewish federation of cleveland (the federation).

Health

Mount Sinai Medical Center of

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health

Mercy Ships International

Operates hospital ships staffed by volunteer medical and non-medical crew to bring free surgeries and medical training to developing countries.

International

Mercy Health Partners

To provide health care and hospital services.

—

Madelia Health

Provide quality healthcare services to the local community.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Francis Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Citymeals-On-Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

12/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$187,200Health$54,000International$16,500Human Services$8,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Recreation & Sports$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LAWRENCE AND MARILYN KAPLAN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~44 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 112764747 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 44 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LAWRENCE AND MARILYN KAPLAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation?

More from the funding graph

LAWRENCE AND MARILYN KAPLAN FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lawrence and Marilyn Kaplan Foundation?

More from the funding graph