How much does Latino Action Network Foundation give?

Latino Action Network Foundation reported 9 itemized grants totaling $2,558,550, out of $2,870,264 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Latino Action Network Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (59%), Youth Development (25%), Civil Rights (12%).

Who are Latino Action Network Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Community Affairs & Resource Center Inc ($3.0M), Hispanic Family Center of Southern New Jersey Inc ($2.8M), La Casa De Don Pedro Inc ($2.6M).

Does Latino Action Network Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Latino Action Network Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of New Jersey, Amazonsmile Foundation.

Where is Latino Action Network Foundation based?

Latino Action Network Foundation is based in NJ.

Latino Action Network Foundation

Latino Action Network Foundation at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Latino Action Network Foundation

Latino Action Network is organized for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes to advance the equitable inclusion of Latino communities in all facets of American society.

$2.9M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$536k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$7.2MYouth Development$3.0MCivil Rights$1.5MPublic Benefit$406kEducation$28kHealth$19k

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 9 grants below total $2,558,550, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,870,264 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $311,714 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k3 grants · $90k
$50k–250k1 grant · $177k
$250k+5 grants · $2.3M

$381,840

Median grant

States reached

$694k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Community Affairs Res Ctr	$536,137
Hispanic Fam Ctr So NJ	$486,743
La Casa De Don Pedro	$486,663
Puerto Rican Action Comm S NJ	$400,472
Morris County Org	$381,840
Imm and American Citizen Org	$176,695
Resistencia En Accion NJ	$43,125
CEUS	$28,125
Allies in Caring	$18,750

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$12M · 6 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$12M

$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%

Still filing today

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS & RESOURCE CENTER INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +546%
HF
HISPANIC FAMILY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +30%
LC
La Casa De Don Pedro Inc
9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +4%

Funded once

RE
Resistencia en Accion New Jersey
one grant, 2025 · $43k · revenue 0%
C
CEUS
one grant, 2025 · $28k
AI
ALLIES IN CARING INC
one grant, 2025 · $19k · revenue 0%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

6/6

Grantees still filing

4/6

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Human Services$10,185,077Other$1,897,228Civil Rights$43,125Health$18,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Latino Action Network Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Latino Action Network Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Latino Action Network Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Latino Action Network Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Latino Action Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home