Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larter Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$266kReligion$194kEmployment$127kYouth Development$127kPhilanthropy$127kEducation$113kRecreation & Sports$40kArts & Culture$13k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,377
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE$3,377
IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC$3,377
EASTER SEALS - GOODWILL AND$3,377
DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOUNDATION INC$3,377
COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION$3,377
REGIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN --$3,377
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$3,377
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $16k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $15k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $14k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $14k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $13k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $13k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $13k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $13k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $12k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$980k · 9 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$980k
$26k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    10× · 2017–2026 · $127k · revenue +120%
  • IY
    IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $127k · revenue +140%
  • DW
    DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOUNDATION INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $127k · revenue +805%

Funded once

  • RC
    REGIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN MINISRTY
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • EF
    EITC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE: $139,502 · OtherDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFAREEASTER SEALS - GOODWILL AND: $126,502 · OtherEASTER SEALS - GOODWILL ANDCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC: $113,402 · OtherCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INCEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN: $108,125 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITANREGIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $72,777 · OtherREGIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INCREGIONAL COUNCILIDAHO FALLS: $40,350 · OtherREGIONAL COUNCILIDAHO FALLS+2 more: $26,475 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $126,502 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $126,502 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RA…DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOUNDATION INC: $126,502 · PhilanthropyDEVELOPMENT WO…
Other$627,133Health$126,502Human Services$126,502Philanthropy$126,502

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $126,502 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $126,502 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOUNDATION INC: $126,502 over 10y, 10% of budgetCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC: $113,402 over 9y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larter Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larter Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larter’s filings →

More from the funding graph