Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larry Reynolds Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$52kArts & Culture$6kPublic Benefit$6kCrime & Legal$3kReligion$2kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$328Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
THE CHURCHIL SOCIETY$750
METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE$500
PRESERVATION RESOURCE CENTER$500
SPRING FIESTA ASSOCIATION$328
AURBOR DAY FOUNDATION$300
LOUISIANA MUSEUM$300
DAUGHTERS OF ST PAUL$100
LOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME$100
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $18k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $17k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $8k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $5k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $500 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$62k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+52%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue -72%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue -32%
  • MC
    METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • LP
    LOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Lafayette General Medical Center Inc

To restore, maintain, and imprive health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC: $48,780 · Human ServicesTRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INCLOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM: $5,750 · OtherLOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUMMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC: $3,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INCTHE CHURCHIL SOCIETY: $1,700 · OtherTHE CHURCHIL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1,500 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYSALVATION ARMY: $1,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUNO FOUNDATION: $1,500 · OtherUNO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $1,410 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOUISIANA MUSEUM: $1,050 · Other+19 more: $4,056 · Other+19 moreNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART: $3,500 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN: $100 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50 · Education
Human Services$48,780Other$22,966Arts & Culture$3,500Health$1,600Education$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC: $48,780 over 5y, 18% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN ↗
  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENTAL TASK COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larry Reynolds Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry Reynolds Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larry Reynolds’ filings →

    More from the funding graph